Cold air intake Difference?
#23
RE: Cold air intake Difference?
As a new 5.0L owner back in '04, I went with advice from a friend from a Mustang family with experience; - Densecharger. My first mod. I got piping from the TB to the fenderwell (7"K&N cone in there) w/a 75mm MAS for $300. Black plastic piping initially looked a bit 'homemade' (less heat absorbed from engine compartment than metal I'm told); IMMEDIATE improvement in power and sound. Good tech service on the phone, too.
My question now is - 65 or 70mm TB?!?
My question now is - 65 or 70mm TB?!?
#24
RE: Cold air intake Difference?
ORIGINAL: musclemustang94
id like to share my personal experience with CAI. In my hot rod class at school we put a drop in filter in a stock 95 gt and got 6 like six horsepower at the wheel. While (believe it or not i have dyno sheets to prove it) we got 20 whp with the bbk cold air kit on a stock mustang. They are so expensive because they have to get the licenses to get a CARB number so they are emissions legal. I say they are worth the money.
id like to share my personal experience with CAI. In my hot rod class at school we put a drop in filter in a stock 95 gt and got 6 like six horsepower at the wheel. While (believe it or not i have dyno sheets to prove it) we got 20 whp with the bbk cold air kit on a stock mustang. They are so expensive because they have to get the licenses to get a CARB number so they are emissions legal. I say they are worth the money.
#25
RE: Cold air intake Difference?
id like to share my personal experience with CAI. In my hot rod class at school we put a drop in filter in a stock 95 gt and got 6 like six horsepower at the wheel. While (believe it or not i have dyno sheets to prove it) we got 20 whp with the bbk cold air kit on a stock mustang. They are so expensive because they have to get the licenses to get a CARB number so they are emissions legal. I say they are worth the money.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-01-2015 08:16 PM