95 5.0 hydralic clutch?
12-13-2006, 05:05 PM
#4
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: michigan, living in O Hi Hoe
Posts: 2,809
RE: 95 5.0 hydralic clutch?
i didn't think so. hydrolic takes long to engage and disengage so it makes sence to stay cable on performance cars... i know ford uses hydrolic on some of the passanger cars tho
12-13-2006, 09:00 PM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 501
RE: 95 5.0 hydralic clutch?
The reason why Ford didn't use hydraulic clutches is most likely because it costs more.
A hydraulic clutches actually is faster and smoother than cable and most importantly requires less maintenence.
I have one in my STi and it's a much better system, not to mention a blessing when stuck in a traffic jam.
A hydraulic clutches actually is faster and smoother than cable and most importantly requires less maintenence.
I have one in my STi and it's a much better system, not to mention a blessing when stuck in a traffic jam.
12-13-2006, 11:06 PM
#7
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
RE: 95 5.0 hydralic clutch?
no you don't have a hydraulic clutch.
the same 10.5" pressure plate and disc will work on your car all the way back to 1985 (b4 that they weren't WC and might work but but i am just saying for sure)
if you want tranny info look at http://www.ddperformance.com
the same 10.5" pressure plate and disc will work on your car all the way back to 1985 (b4 that they weren't WC and might work but but i am just saying for sure)
if you want tranny info look at http://www.ddperformance.com
12-13-2006, 11:41 PM
#9
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: michigan, living in O Hi Hoe
Posts: 2,809
RE: 95 5.0 hydralic clutch?
then explain why the LT1 and LS1 guys have to drill holes in the hydrolic set ups so the clutch will release fast enough so shift???? my buddy has a LT1 and if you tryed to shift fast the clutch wouldn't disengage intime
ORIGINAL: sc94gt
The reason why Ford didn't use hydraulic clutches is most likely because it costs more.
A hydraulic clutches actually is faster and smoother than cable and most importantly requires less maintenence.
I have one in my STi and it's a much better system, not to mention a blessing when stuck in a traffic jam.
The reason why Ford didn't use hydraulic clutches is most likely because it costs more.
A hydraulic clutches actually is faster and smoother than cable and most importantly requires less maintenence.
I have one in my STi and it's a much better system, not to mention a blessing when stuck in a traffic jam.
