5.0 vs 4.6
01-14-2007, 12:57 AM
#51
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: buying tires!
Posts: 3,220
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
your right its not a production car that boss stang. but dude does that car look bad azz or what? and being carburated that engine compartment is pretty clean.cool ride.
ORIGINAL: Red FIVE O
its in the 5.0 Mag. i thought they were just bringing the Boss block into prod. not the actual car.
the one in the mag was made by Galpin motorsports and some other guy.
it had The boss block and it was carb'd. but i dont recall them actually going to be producing it and rolling them off the factory line.
ORIGINAL: dimebag
u have to understand... 96-98 they did put out 225<or something like that. 99+ they changed heads "PI" heads... they make 250 or so, not exactly sure, but around there.
and ford is bringing back the 5.0, im prty sure some new stangs are gonna have the new 5.0 in them. some kinda special edition ones.<its in 5.0 or MM&FF.
the 5.0 makes better tq then the 4.6.
stock for stock a foxbody, or sn95 will beat a 96-98 4.6, but not a 99+.
personally, tho its older technology, i like pushrod motors better, just my opinion tho. there simpler, and easy to work on. never took apart an ohc v8 yet, so idk bout them, seems like there is a good bit more work involved in them.
u have to understand... 96-98 they did put out 225<or something like that. 99+ they changed heads "PI" heads... they make 250 or so, not exactly sure, but around there.
and ford is bringing back the 5.0, im prty sure some new stangs are gonna have the new 5.0 in them. some kinda special edition ones.<its in 5.0 or MM&FF.
the 5.0 makes better tq then the 4.6.
stock for stock a foxbody, or sn95 will beat a 96-98 4.6, but not a 99+.
personally, tho its older technology, i like pushrod motors better, just my opinion tho. there simpler, and easy to work on. never took apart an ohc v8 yet, so idk bout them, seems like there is a good bit more work involved in them.
the one in the mag was made by Galpin motorsports and some other guy.
it had The boss block and it was carb'd. but i dont recall them actually going to be producing it and rolling them off the factory line.
01-14-2007, 04:34 AM
#53
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,826
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ORIGINAL: notch5oh
that makes no sense, first the 5.0h.o.IS a truck motor, and second the 4.6 is ALSO used in trucks
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: MEM 302 5.0L
and dont forget about that 5.0 cammer engine
[/blockquote]
which is just a bored and stroked 2 valve 4.6
the "cammer" is a 4 valve i was just looking at it in a catologue
I really like the sound of a 4.6. You can spend a lot of money trying to make a 5.0 not sound like a truck.
[blockquote]quote:
ORIGINAL: MEM 302 5.0L
and dont forget about that 5.0 cammer engine
[/blockquote]
which is just a bored and stroked 2 valve 4.6
01-16-2007, 09:40 PM
#54
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bonney Lake
Posts: 89
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ya matt my car is lookin goregous, but there all little bolt ons, driving experience is what really counts! i shaved one second off my 1/4 mile time from one year to the next with no bolt ons..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
10-09-2015 03:27 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
