5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

302 vs 302 HO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2007, 03:15 PM
  #21  
enzedchris
2nd Gear Member
 
enzedchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand, living in USA
Posts: 156
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

alright-would you have said in real life, when someone would have asked you that same exact question- you supposed to look in the tech articles, jackass.- i doubt it, stop growing ***** because your not face to face with someone
enzedchris is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 04:17 PM
  #22  
7upedition
5th Gear Member
 
7upedition's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central New York
Posts: 3,850
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

ORIGINAL: enzedchris
alright-would you have said in real life, when someone would have asked you that same exact question- you supposed to look in the tech articles, jackass.- i doubt it, stop growing ***** because your not face to face with someone
Iagree with you on the face to face question, however the situation doesn't fit that scenario. All i'm saying is theres a lot of ground covered in the tech articles and its a good place to start.As for the last comment I have no comment... its funny to me!
7upedition is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 04:23 PM
  #23  
enzedchris
2nd Gear Member
 
enzedchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand, living in USA
Posts: 156
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

im just saying what if the person didn't know about the tech articles, and my gripe is that i never asked that adder person specifically, i was asking anyone what i might need in addition to what i have to beat an evo, and adder goes 99.9 percent of what you said was a waste of time, first off what the fuc(k he doesn't know me, secondly i was just beign specific and what he said was totally unnecessary. he by no means knows everything, and neither does anyone else, i was just asking for any additions to my plans and got bull**** back. that's what i'm pissed about.
enzedchris is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:32 PM
  #24  
7upedition
5th Gear Member
 
7upedition's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central New York
Posts: 3,850
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

ORIGINAL: enzedchris
if i could delete my account i would.
Just so you know, PRO50SC can take care of that for you if you really want to leave.
7upedition is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 03:12 AM
  #25  
lowlife4life
Thread Starter
 
lowlife4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

well i'm sorry if i sounded like a crybabie wasn't trying to. just did not know anythign bout the tech articles but he was coming at me like i was suposed to know everything on the forum.
lowlife4life is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 03:14 AM
  #26  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

ORIGINAL: primeredstang

the high output motor has the 351w heads and cam the other one doesnt

They did? hell i wish so, someone help me here, i didnt know that.....
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 04:23 AM
  #27  
87ragtop
1st Gear Member
 
87ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 51
Default RE: 302 vs 302 HO

wow... ppl complain alot... n you have to admit... some ppl on here can be a tad harsh... but hey its like school.... they, in fact, do know more than you... they have the red pen and u have the blue... fact of life
87ragtop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
04-29-2019 02:56 PM
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM
69Volunteer
Classic Mustang General Discussion
1
09-30-2015 10:39 AM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
09-14-2015 10:29 AM



Quick Reply: 302 vs 302 HO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.