5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

how bout it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2007, 12:00 AM
  #1  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default how bout it

since the whole speed density issue is killing me i decided to find another way to go to upgrade my 5.slow and make it fast and this is what i found
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/400-h...QQcmdZViewItem

now i saw this motor in person and it really is what it says it is, and i was just hopin to get some feed back as to what you all thought about it. its a direct swap, all i need is the timing cover and teh intake and headers, all total it would run close to 3000

what do u guys think
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:04 AM
  #2  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: how bout it

is it a 4 bolt main, i noticed the cleveland heads too, the only heads that had too big of ports that only had high HP at high rpms was the "tunnel ports heads" and were only on the 69 boss 302, i believe thats right, im not exactly sure, dont have my book to look at right now
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:07 AM
  #3  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: how bout it

the ones on the origeinal boss were the 4v heads with ports the size of a tennis ball, these are the 2v heads they are a lot smaller and perform better on the street. they have a gr8 low end
ORIGINAL: 90Lxstanger

is it a 4 bolt main, i noticed the cleveland heads too, the only heads that had too big of ports that only had high HP at high rpms was the "tunnel ports heads" and were only on the 69 boss 302, i believe thats right, im not exactly sure, dont have my book to look at right now
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:17 AM
  #4  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: how bout it

"In the most extreme performance applications, builders opted for the huge ports of the 351 Cleveland heads, a swap that required different pistons, water passage modifications, and a special intake manifold." http://www.mustangandfords.com/techa...ads_flow_test/
Im pretty sure cleveland heads werent even interchangbale with a 302, considering the block arent even the same
vavle size for the 2v cleveland -2.03intake/1.67exhaust
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:20 AM
  #5  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: how bout it

i kno this already thats why i figure the machine work alone will be worth over 2000 so i am just wondering what else i should be concerned with
ORIGINAL: 90Lxstanger

"In the most extreme performance applications, builders opted for the huge ports of the 351 Cleveland heads, a swap that required different pistons, water passage modifications, and a special intake manifold." http://www.mustangandfords.com/techa...ads_flow_test/
Im pretty sure cleveland heads werent even interchangbale with a 302, considering the block arent even the same
vavle size for the 2v cleveland -2.03intake/1.67exhaust
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:24 AM
  #6  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: how bout it

those huge ports are gonna kill low end torque, and was the block a 4 bolt or not?
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:27 AM
  #7  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: how bout it

i m pretty sure its a 2 bolt, but i gotta email him again so i will ask
ORIGINAL: 90Lxstanger

those huge ports are gonna kill low end torque, and was the block a 4 bolt or not?
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:37 AM
  #8  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: how bout it

the flow numbers really arent that great-The numbers came in strong with a 198-cfm figure at .600-inch lift on the intake and an even more impressive 162.7-cfm flow on the exhaust.
These numbers are from Thumber ported e7s-219.9/160
the exhaust is great from the cleveland thought, and for the block being said its a "clone" just seems kinda weary that its not a 4 bolt, but it might be, for the price and the power, it seems like not too bad of a deal but maybe not the best, IMO
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 02-01-2007, 12:59 AM
  #9  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: how bout it

thanks man,

anyone else
ih8chevy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$A_Money$81
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
08-11-2015 01:30 PM
99StangCoupe
Detailing
3
06-20-2004 04:32 AM
89lx302
New Member Area
3
05-26-2004 12:40 AM
99StangCoupe
General Tech
3
04-24-2004 09:44 PM



Quick Reply: how bout it



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.