5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Should I stroke or not

Old 02-12-2007, 11:50 PM
  #11  
bouchermb
4th Gear Member
 
bouchermb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,306
Default RE: Should I stroke or not

I did SC, intake, and all the other typical mods (exhaust, gears, headers, exhaust, electric fan, ign. etc.)but my bottleneck was in my heads.

I just had a 347 built with Canfield 195 heads and a custom grind cam,by Jay Allen at Camshaft Innovations, 1.6 RR'sand am psyched to get it dyno'd. If you're doing an SC, you'll need to upgrade the inj. 30's would be fine, but think ahead. If you're going to do more down the road, you'll most likely need bigger inj.
bouchermb is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 05:30 AM
  #12  
FoxBodyin07
Thread Starter
 
FoxBodyin07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
Default RE: Should I stroke or not

I just want to say thank you to all who replied to my post. It is awesome to be able to get advice and opinons from you guys who have been around these cars for years and years and who have a far better understanding of them than I do.
FoxBodyin07 is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 07:13 AM
  #13  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default RE: Should I stroke or not

no problem if u have anymore questions ask away i am sure someone can answer ur questions
w8less is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 11:54 AM
  #14  
aode08
5th Gear Member
 
aode08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 4,616
Default RE: Should I stroke or not

A supercharger, with some ported stock heads or gt 40 and bigger upper and lower intake will make you happy at 9psi.

The 225 hp 5.0 legend is gone, you now need at least 350 flywheel hp to keep up with modern sports cars, that will try you, even mom in the minivan has 240+ hp now..


The retrofit parts and shops are killing us on our stroker kits and retrofit parts, some chevy parts are like 40% lower cost than Ford.[:'(]

If you want naturally aspirated and doing the work yourself, a $3,500 budget is what your gonna be looking at, after parts, good machining, balancing,taxes and misc stuff on a 351w stroked over with HCIE .


aode08 is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 01:59 PM
  #15  
gearbanger
4th Gear Member
 
gearbanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,836
Default RE: Should I stroke or not

ORIGINAL: FoxBodyin07

I am pretty new to this so forgive me if I ask any ridiculous questions but, I am looking to buy an 87 - 93 GT mustang, manual tranny, within a year or so and and have a few questions before I do. First of all, is there any way to test a block on the spot to see how solid it is before you buy a car. Second, Im looking to get about 350 - 400hp out of it for as cheap as possible. What I plan to do is to stroke the 302 to a 347 and leave the rest as stock as possible. What kind of hp would this change make? And, what other changes would be necessary in order to make my car function properly? Would I need to make any changes to the suspension because of it being stroked? Any help on these couple of topics would be greatly appreciated.

yes the first thing should be suspension.... you will twist the body to hell is you dont!!!!...
gearbanger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
05-03-2018 10:38 PM
1987gt40ttopt
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
12
08-28-2015 10:49 PM
SCARFACE
Chop Shop
26
06-30-2006 03:04 AM
mysticsvtcobra96
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
01-08-2005 11:48 AM
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
18
10-27-2004 02:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Should I stroke or not



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.