5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

no cats vs. high flows

Old 02-27-2007, 01:06 AM
  #21  
AlabamaCobra
2nd Gear Member
 
AlabamaCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 450
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

ORIGINAL: black_89gt

im glad i dont have to worry about emissions here
same here, good ole alabama.
AlabamaCobra is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:13 AM
  #22  
AlabamaCobra
2nd Gear Member
 
AlabamaCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 450
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

ORIGINAL: 1995mustang818

it smells really bad some times
youll live
AlabamaCobra is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:19 AM
  #23  
tjmon1
2nd Gear Member
 
tjmon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 171
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

I have no cats.. It smells up the whole house sometimes while I am waiting for it to warm up. I don't give a crap, it's fast.
tjmon1 is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:28 AM
  #24  
Dubs
2nd Gear Member
 
Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 394
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

+1...

ORIGINAL: dimebag

i went from stock cats to no cats, and all i can say is i wont put cats on the car again except for emissions time. yea you get a little smell, but only when im really gettin in to it... and ill be honest... gotta love that smell too, lol. goes great w. the whole 5.0 thing and the whole loud mean car thing, lol.
Dubs is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:35 AM
  #25  
dv3
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: denver
Posts: 661
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

i think that from what i heard so far there isnt much diffrencein no cats vs. high flows.......and the extra cost would pay for itself after getting a ticket for no cats....

dv3 is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 02:04 AM
  #26  
cbennett
3rd Gear Member
 
cbennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 544
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

just smells like fuel to me? doesnt bother me..
are you smelling the same thing?
cbennett is offline  
Old 02-28-2007, 01:50 AM
  #27  
Goodman_95 GT
 
Goodman_95 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 32
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

ORIGINAL: AlabamaCobra

ORIGINAL: black_89gt

im glad i dont have to worry about emissions here
same here, good ole alabama.
haha. gotta loveour states. thank you, indiana!
Goodman_95 GT is offline  
Old 02-28-2007, 05:16 AM
  #28  
gspfunk
5th Gear Member
 
gspfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,834
Default RE: no cats vs. high flows

I don't remember where, but tests I've seen showed like 8 flywheel hp differences between Hi flo cats and no cats. Stock catted pipes are more restrictive.
gspfunk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CS2007
General Tech
8
06-25-2019 09:45 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-30-2015 03:48 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: no cats vs. high flows



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.