Wideband o2?
03-01-2007, 02:18 AM
#11
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,375
RE: Wideband o2?
Personally, I would prefer to keep the dual O2 setup, whether using NB or WB O2's.
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
03-01-2007, 02:21 AM
#12
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
RE: Wideband o2?
ORIGINAL: vristang
Personally, I would prefer to keep the dual O2 setup, whether using NB or WB O2's.
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
Personally, I would prefer to keep the dual O2 setup, whether using NB or WB O2's.
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
03-01-2007, 02:28 AM
#13
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,375
RE: Wideband o2?
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2
I'm going to be using both my stock narrow band sensors for everyday running of my car, but my tuning will be done with my wideband. the MS can read from both sensors
ORIGINAL: vristang
Personally, I would prefer to keep the dual O2 setup, whether using NB or WB O2's.
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
Personally, I would prefer to keep the dual O2 setup, whether using NB or WB O2's.
The benefit will come with troubleshooting and datalogging.
I am not sure on the MS, but with the tweecer most folks leave the stock O2's, and add in a WB sensor.
Personally, I will be using 2 LC-1 WB's in place of the factory sensors. I don't see a reason to keep the stock O2's.
jason
just curious.
The MS keeps sounding better and better...
03-01-2007, 02:31 AM
#14
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
RE: Wideband o2?
I can leave it plugged in if I want to. but the WB I have has a 12" lead with a plug, which is connected under my car, so yes, I can unplug it and install the plug in the bung that came with my wideband
03-01-2007, 02:35 AM
#15
RE: Wideband o2?
So I'm still confused. What would I be better off doing? I'm not sure if I want to make a hole and then weld in my exhaust. Should I run just one wideband sensor and cover up the other one? Or run two wideband sensors (not sure how I'd do this)? Or if I have to run both of the narrowbands and an extra wideband? Or could I even run one narrowband and one wideband? Im sorry if I keep repeating my self, I just want a for sure answer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4ValveGrabber
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
07-13-2006 01:29 AM
callmeebryan@tps
Parts For Sale
1
02-13-2006 09:37 PM
