5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

347 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2007, 11:26 PM
  #1  
john14035
Thread Starter
 
john14035's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Default 347 stroker

Hi All! I am a new member in search of advice. I have a 95 GT that I have done the following to: Mahl 347 stroker kit bored .40 over w/probe pistons, twisted wedge heads, B303 cam, SCT custom chip, 75MM throttle body, 80mm mass air meter, GT40 uper and lower intake, BBK off road pipe with shorty headers, 24 lb injectors, cold air, MSD blaster coil, 9MM wires, 1:6 (intake)and 1:7 (exhaust)roller rockers, Tremec T5, king cobra clutch, alum fly wheel, 3:73 gears...I just got back from a dyno tune and at the rear wheels it did 282 HP and 323 torque @ 5100 RPM. I was expecting more. What combo do you think I have wrong or do you think it's just the lack of camholding it back.[:@]

john14035 is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 11:33 PM
  #2  
bouchermb
4th Gear Member
 
bouchermb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,306
Default RE: 347 stroker

Those numbers aren't bad and I actually did the same numbers after I installed a 5 psi SC. That was before my stroker, cam, heads, Pro M MAF, 42 lb. inj. Tremcc TKO 500 trans, which I shoudl have back together and to the tuner soon. I would say the cam could be a weak point.
bouchermb is offline  
Old 03-05-2007, 11:49 PM
  #3  
john14035
Thread Starter
 
john14035's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Default RE: 347 stroker

I appreciate your reply!
john14035 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:12 AM
  #4  
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
FullAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: 347 stroker

302 parts make 302 power. You need to scrap the intake and cam. But even with those, you're still down on power.

Was it a Mustang Dyno?
FullAuto is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 12:20 AM
  #5  
LTnone
4th Gear Member
 
LTnone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,897
Default RE: 347 stroker

Agreed. Even though, a 347 with those mods should be making more than that... Your TB is a bit big, a 70 would be a better choice. That's not gonna make the difference, though. Is your timing off maybe?
LTnone is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:07 AM
  #6  
john14035
Thread Starter
 
john14035's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Default RE: 347 stroker

The dyno was an MD Mustang Dyno at D & G Dyno Tune in Hennessey, OK.
john14035 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:08 AM
  #7  
john14035
Thread Starter
 
john14035's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Default RE: 347 stroker

What intake would you recomend?
john14035 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:09 AM
  #8  
92hatchLX
6th Gear Member
 
92hatchLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,439
Default RE: 347 stroker

Those are horrible numbers dude.
92hatchLX is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:10 AM
  #9  
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
FullAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: 347 stroker

That's probably in the 310rwhp range on a Dynojet. Too bad you used a Mustang Dyno. It's all up to the operator. He could have simply entered the wrong weight for your car and your numbers would be off. Your numbers are worthless for comparision purposes.

But 310rwhp on a Dynojet probably is about right. I wouldn't expect you to make 1rwhp/ci with your parts. You're leaving a lot of power on the table.
FullAuto is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:12 AM
  #10  
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
FullAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: 347 stroker

ORIGINAL: john14035

What intake would you recomend?
Depends on what cam you're going to use. With the cam you've got you might as well not change. Ideally, I'd probablyrun something like a Holley or Victor 5.0.
FullAuto is offline  


Quick Reply: 347 stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.