289 - 302 - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

Notices
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

289 - 302

Reply

 
 
 
Old 04-08-2007, 01:38 PM
  #11  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: 289 - 302

the 289 heads dont flow as good as the E7's, they are nothing special BUT the stroke and rod length of a 289 makes it superior to a 302 for two reasons.....

faster revving
higher rpm ceiling

they use the same piston, and because of this and the shorter stroke they use a 5.155 rod instead of the 302's 5.090 rod. better rod/stroke ratio is a good thing.

FYI, i head that you can use the older 2 piece rear main seal cranks in a later 1 piece block by simply having a raised rib on the rear sealing area machined down when the shop regrinds the crank. that would be your best bet cause you'd retain a roller lifter block with the benefits of having a 289.

and btw, the HP you'll loose by giving up 13 cubic inches will be more than made up for in the benefits stated about the 289
my77stang is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 08:50 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 02:02 AM
GTJIM
New Member Area
7
09-23-2015 10:59 AM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
09-14-2015 11:29 AM
ryland
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-13-2015 01:35 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 289 - 302


Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.