MustangForums.com

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

90 model -vs-95

   
Old 12-06-2004, 02:09 AM
  #1  
5.0mustang5speed
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
5.0mustang5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 477
Default 90 model -vs-95
when i get my car...i want either a 89-9 model or the 94-95...how much slower in stock form is the 94-95;s
5.0mustang5speed is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 02:44 AM
  #2  
Dbeck002
I ♥ Acer
 
Dbeck002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,802
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
they are a little heavier than the foxbody and i think only put out 215 HP instead of 225 for the 92's.
Dbeck002 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 03:14 AM
  #3  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
93 is the lesser year of power for the foxes.[not really tho] i would jump on a Sn95 shell in a heartbeat if i came across a clean one. Foxes are nice but i like the Sn95 better. it may be heavier but still i can make it lighter and fast
Quik is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 03:58 AM
  #4  
71455olds
1st Gear Member
 
71455olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 110
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
the sn95 is a mutch better car less rattles 4 wheel disc's but the fox is better looking

you can get better deals on sn-95's also the fox's are getting rare
71455olds is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 01:51 PM
  #5  
nemethjames1
4th Gear Member
 
nemethjames1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,665
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
i never liked the looks of a sn95... i would stick with a fox but thats just my opinion
nemethjames1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 02:51 PM
  #6  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95

ORIGINAL: nemethjames1

i never liked the looks of a sn95... i would stick with a fox but thats just my opinion
ditto
4fit? is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 03:36 PM
  #7  
87mustang347
3rd Gear Member
 
87mustang347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 661
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
ill always stick with a fox. sn94-95 are nice lookin but there to heavy.
87mustang347 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 06:03 PM
  #8  
roundman
5th Gear Member
 
roundman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 4,813
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
ORIGINAL: 4fit?


ORIGINAL: nemethjames1

i never liked the looks of a sn95... i would stick with a fox but thats just my opinion
ditto
late 80's Foxes rule IMO.
roundman is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 07:03 PM
  #9  
nemethjames1
4th Gear Member
 
nemethjames1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,665
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
not only your opinion...... most everyone else too[sm=loveeyes.gif]
nemethjames1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2004, 07:32 PM
  #10  
thelast50ho
2nd Gear Member
 
thelast50ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 355
Default RE: 90 model -vs-95
go for the 95 just put some gears in it and youll be ok[sm=trust_me.gif]
thelast50ho is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 90 model -vs-95


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.