5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

HEADERS, BBK OR MAC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2007, 09:30 PM
  #21  
mustang5_0gt
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mustang5_0gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 232
Default RE: HEADERS, BBK OR MAC

thanks for everyones input, I do believe bbk shorties are the way 2 go!
mustang5_0gt is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 09:35 PM
  #22  
90Lxstanger
3rd Gear Member
 
90Lxstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 959
Default RE: HEADERS, BBK OR MAC

Here a writeup Q&A from BBK maybe itll help you decide a little
Q. I am trying to decide between regular shorties or equal length shorty headers for my 5.0L Mustang. Which do you think I should pick?
(part numbers affected include: 1515, 15150, 1512, 15120, 1525, 15250, 1529, 15290)
A. There is no "right" answer to this question! Both have their up sides and down sides, and both are potent performers. The equal length shorties offer better performance for the dollar, no doubt. But the down side is that because of the extra tubing required before the collector, you will have to work around all that mass during install and tune ups, and there will be less clearance. The regular shorty headers are still a great value, and offer much improved performance over stock. And since they follow an easy design, installation and tune ups is more of a breeze than with the equal lengths. In the end, the decision is yours: Do you want the most power you can get out of shorty headers, or are you more interested in a balanced power gain with easier installation and maintenance?
90Lxstanger is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 09:39 PM
  #23  
CrazyCobraSpeed
4th Gear Member
 
CrazyCobraSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,892
Default RE: HEADERS, BBK OR MAC

get MAC HTS equal length shorties and go to autozone and get ceramic paint (in a can dupicolor) and this is you best bet.. its the cheapest and it will look better than normaly cermaic coating and last just as long... i have long to headers and i put 4 coats on and i used up 3 cans... its like 5 bucks a can so for 15 buck u can get ceramic coating... get some1 to bak it oh if u want ot go all the way... diffenetly get equal length headers tho... its helps hte each cylinder to have equal pressure... its a very small difference but if you goin to spen the money u mite as well do it rite... they may be tougher to but on but htere better for hte engine and look badass too... not to mention ull see better hp numbers
CrazyCobraSpeed is offline  
Old 04-25-2007, 09:42 PM
  #24  
Arrid Extra Dry
2nd Gear Member
 
Arrid Extra Dry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 236
Default RE: HEADERS, BBK OR MAC

BBK
Arrid Extra Dry is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
Jb145700
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
9
08-21-2022 06:37 AM
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
JDWalton
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
8
09-24-2015 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: HEADERS, BBK OR MAC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.