5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

More Hp without more fuel...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2007, 06:14 PM
  #11  
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
dimebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earleville md
Posts: 10,357
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

he was if he had a tire... well, let me rephrase... if i took my car, added what he listed, ontop of the FEW things i have now, id run a 13.6 i havent touched the motor a damn bit
dimebag is offline  
Old 05-23-2007, 06:23 PM
  #12  
liketoskate1
2nd Gear Member
 
liketoskate1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 176
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

wieght reduction
liketoskate1 is offline  
Old 05-23-2007, 06:25 PM
  #13  
LTnone
4th Gear Member
 
LTnone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,897
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

Don't waste your money on an aluminum driveshaft, though... not gonna make a difference at this point
LTnone is offline  
Old 05-23-2007, 07:33 PM
  #14  
Stella94GT
3rd Gear Member
 
Stella94GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 875
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

what about the 90mm LMAF like he said earlier.. im thinking about that too. what kind of power would that add
Stella94GT is offline  
Old 05-24-2007, 03:21 AM
  #15  
LTnone
4th Gear Member
 
LTnone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,897
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

You don't need a 90mm MAF, that's just ungodly excessive. A 70-77 will do fine. Since the stock MAF is smaller than the stock TB, you will see a small increase with a larger one. Only a few horses, but it's something
LTnone is offline  
Old 05-24-2007, 11:55 PM
  #16  
Jfsram
4th Gear Member
 
Jfsram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,999
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

ORIGINAL: FivePointOhh

wrong information. same hp....measuerd differently compared to previous years. and i would like to call bs on that last statement. if all it was...was a coupe and thats all you had and nothing else....you werent running a 13.6
I've read between 87 and 93 there were a few cam changes. Minor but different. Each change was about a 2 or 3 hp loss.
The only weight reduction was I removed the amp and sub box.

Tires are not part of the equation here. It's on Dunlop 235 45 17's
SP902's. Left on idle with a 2.0 60'.

Also has long tubes and a pair of Flowmasters. I didn't bother to mention them because I'm confident they are not helping.
Jfsram is offline  
Old 05-26-2007, 03:17 PM
  #17  
Jfsram
4th Gear Member
 
Jfsram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,999
Default RE: More Hp without more fuel...

A few things I forgot to mention FivePointOhh. I have AC, 52psi in the tires, a full tank of 87 octane, closed throttle shifting like an Asian dude and shift points at 4800rpm.


Next time before you reply. Read some facts.

http://www.mustanggt.org/gtchange.htm
Jfsram is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GT03 TJS
4.6L General Discussion
3
08-16-2014 06:21 AM
66_grn_fstbk
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
2
06-12-2014 09:25 AM
BlackGhost
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
03-27-2013 12:59 PM
4.6HighPerformance
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
08-01-2007 08:27 PM
4.6HighPerformance
GT S197 General Discussion
2
08-01-2007 06:25 PM



Quick Reply: More Hp without more fuel...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.