5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

NON roller block BOSS 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2007, 10:25 PM
  #11  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

Billett cam? its a hyd roller for a fox mustang. and I was using all the efi stuff from my fox as well. I think the CR will be fine with some 30lb injectors. Why do I need special cam bearings?

ORIGINAL: rcdblink716

O ya u'll have to get special cam bearings for the billett cam and a brass distributor gear.
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 10:26 PM
  #12  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

Cobra=pain in the ***. It cost so much to do anything with it. I can build a fast as **** fox for less. Also because I bought the lightning. Which is faster anyway.
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 10:29 PM
  #13  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

ORIGINAL: Tims 88GT

^^ I was wondering if I could do it that way. I did not see y not. I have all that stuff. For thoes worried about the CR I am going to run. I am not. You can do wonders with fuel injection. The cam is Mild the timing will be mild. When I figure out what heads I am going to run I will get the biggest combustion chambers they offer.
You would be "limited" to a small base circle cam......[:'(] ....the "regular" HR cams could not be used....
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 10:35 PM
  #14  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

Ok y is that?
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:00 PM
  #15  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

Block lifters boss height, which is what changed back in '85 when Ford intoduced the HR block to accommodate/fit the longer HR lifters ......the old 302 Boss block is a short lifters boss block (=not roller ready) reason for the linked lifters....if you install the retrofit holddown and dog bones + a regular base circle HR cam.............guess what will happen to the lifters.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:43 PM
  #16  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

isnt the old boss block a solid roller? if it is I would keep that. hyd roller is not always the best way to go.
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:48 PM
  #17  
ZachW04Stang
5th Gear Member
 
ZachW04Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 4,343
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

Using the link bar lifter is the only way to go. I had an 83 motor and found it wasn't really worth the extra money to swap over. Hydraulic flat tappet lifters and hydraulic flat tappet cam cost the same as the lifters.

Also with that boss block I think your stuck using clevaland heads or your gonna have to have it drilled for small block ford heads.
ZachW04Stang is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:48 PM
  #18  
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: las vegas, nv
Posts: 9,092
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

ORIGINAL: rcdblink716

You can do it like they do it on the late models. Drill and tap the block for the plate that holds down the lifter separators(dunno what they're called) That would be the cheap way
thats how i did it for the motor in my sig. the block is a 68 from a cougar but wanted hydrollic roller. cost about $20 at the machine shop.
luckythirteen13 is offline  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:58 PM
  #19  
ih8chevy
5th Gear Member
 
ih8chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: west chester
Posts: 3,305
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

why would u want to go wit a windsor head if the block is already drilled for cleve's. the cleves are so much better, all he needs is an intake and he has a nasty motor. tim its good to c ya, congrats on the lightning and want to hear more about the clevor.
ORIGINAL: ZachW04Stang

Using the link bar lifter is the only way to go. I had an 83 motor and found it wasn't really worth the extra money to swap over. Hydraulic flat tappet lifters and hydraulic flat tappet cam cost the same as the lifters.

Also with that boss block I think your stuck using clevaland heads or your gonna have to have it drilled for small block ford heads.
ih8chevy is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 12:06 AM
  #20  
rcdblink716
3rd Gear Member
 
rcdblink716's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 585
Default RE: NON roller block BOSS 302

The roller cams are billet, they're made of a harder material. I dunno maybe forged but I think billet. Put cleveland heads on the boss, otherwise it isn't a boss. You can get some badcleveland heads cheap.
rcdblink716 is offline  


Quick Reply: NON roller block BOSS 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.