87-93 or 94-94 5.0
#11
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
ORIGINAL: Aliate X
Yeah, engine parts cost more, who knows why, they love to bring prices up.
A s/c for my 93 5.0 would run me 2500 which puts out 10lbs of boost.
The same s/c for a 99-03 GT i think it was cost 4500. Vortech btw, in the summit mag.
Yeah, engine parts cost more, who knows why, they love to bring prices up.
A s/c for my 93 5.0 would run me 2500 which puts out 10lbs of boost.
The same s/c for a 99-03 GT i think it was cost 4500. Vortech btw, in the summit mag.
#12
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
the accesories are obviously the same, but things like headers and intakes and such are more expensive and different. you cannot swap fox headers for 94-95 because the internal structure of the car is different. plus you can find parts for a fox much cheaper.
personally i think the 94-95 body style is dull in stock form. the fox bodys have a meaner look which is why i got it. 94-95 are also a bit heavier if i remember correctly but then again you want the looks and not the power. so in the end, just get what you want. i prefer power over looks so i got the fox. you can go the other route but you wont be running 13s for a while.
personally i think the 94-95 body style is dull in stock form. the fox bodys have a meaner look which is why i got it. 94-95 are also a bit heavier if i remember correctly but then again you want the looks and not the power. so in the end, just get what you want. i prefer power over looks so i got the fox. you can go the other route but you wont be running 13s for a while.
#13
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
[Reply to Message]
#14
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
ORIGINAL: _IZoCk_
I have a 95Gt and i love it. I have 17/10.5 cobra rims on it with 315 tires. Ill never give it up. Also it seems like the ladies arnt big mustang fans. When i ride my dads benz or acura i get alot more looks. Sigh....
[Reply to Message]
#15
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
ORIGINAL: Dbeck002
the accesories are obviously the same, but things like headers and intakes and such are more expensive and different. you cannot swap fox headers for 94-95 because the internal structure of the car is different. plus you can find parts for a fox much cheaper.
personally i think the 94-95 body style is dull in stock form. the fox bodys have a meaner look which is why i got it. 94-95 are also a bit heavier if i remember correctly but then again you want the looks and not the power. so in the end, just get what you want. i prefer power over looks so i got the fox. you can go the other route but you wont be running 13s for a while.
the accesories are obviously the same, but things like headers and intakes and such are more expensive and different. you cannot swap fox headers for 94-95 because the internal structure of the car is different. plus you can find parts for a fox much cheaper.
personally i think the 94-95 body style is dull in stock form. the fox bodys have a meaner look which is why i got it. 94-95 are also a bit heavier if i remember correctly but then again you want the looks and not the power. so in the end, just get what you want. i prefer power over looks so i got the fox. you can go the other route but you wont be running 13s for a while.
#17
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
ORIGINAL: 4fit?
With that kind of money, if you make smart purchases and make sure everything works we together, you could be deep into the 11s, if not 10s.
With that kind of money, if you make smart purchases and make sure everything works we together, you could be deep into the 11s, if not 10s.
I'm really trying not to dive TOOO far into loss of gas efficiency until i can get another daily driver. .. . possibly a bike or a 4 cylinder.
#19
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
ORIGINAL: Dbeck002
hey if you got the cash, turbocharge the 95 and youll be running low 11's...
hey if you got the cash, turbocharge the 95 and youll be running low 11's...
#20
RE: 87-93 or 94-94 5.0
i prefere foxbody, the 94 95 were only made for those years but the foxbodys were made for a long time, and just about everything is interchangeable... i would have to say the body style looks better... and if you put the same ammount of money into a stock fox, then into a stock 94+ i think the fox would look better and be way faster.... IMO