5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Fuel Injection or Carbs???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2007, 01:44 PM
  #1  
scotty 5.0 mustang
Thread Starter
 
scotty 5.0 mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
Default Fuel Injection or Carbs???

I have got a 95 Mustang 5.0 Gt, And i cant decide if i should stick to injection or convert to carbs, I wanna be running big power eventualy! What do you think i should do? Anyone gotany adviceand pro's and con's?

scotty 5.0 mustang is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 02:05 PM
  #2  
adumb
3rd Gear Member
 
adumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 564
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

search button?
adumb is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 02:11 PM
  #3  
P Zero
5th Gear Member
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,986
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

I say go for carbs. It costs WAY less for a GOOD intake and carb setup than it does for a comprable EFI setup. Like im talkin thousands less.
Carbs pro's- Cheap, reliable, easy to work with, clean up engine bay nicely, lots of inexpensive intakes cheaper roots style superchargers..
Cons- Tuning can be a bitch (depending on carb brand), gas milage suffers a wee bit.

EFI Pro's- Gas milage, easier tuning (but MUCH more expensive), runs better when cold, better for turbo's, reliable.
CONS: PRICE, for your model - tuning is a bitch youd probably need an aftermarket engine management system, messy engine compartment. Intakes alone cost MUCH more than an intake and carb together (for comprable performance).
-P.
P Zero is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 02:47 PM
  #4  
302f150
3rd Gear Member
 
302f150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 531
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

ORIGINAL: P Zero

I say go for carbs. It costs WAY less for a GOOD intake and carb setup than it does for a comprable EFI setup. Like im talkin thousands less.
Carbs pro's- Cheap, reliable, easy to work with, clean up engine bay nicely, lots of inexpensive intakes cheaper roots style superchargers..
Cons- Tuning can be a bitch (depending on carb brand), gas milage suffers a wee bit.

EFI Pro's- Gas milage, easier tuning (but MUCH more expensive), runs better when cold, better for turbo's, reliable.
CONS: PRICE, for your model - tuning is a bitch youd probably need an aftermarket engine management system, messy engine compartment. Intakes alone cost MUCH more than an intake and carb together (for comprable performance).
-P.
+1, its easier to get more hp out or carb setups b/c they dont have all the intake restrictions. but if your willing to sink the money into an EFI system it will be better all around......startup cold, better gas mileage(like 10%), you will have more of a clutter in ur engine bay, but hell, ur already runnin EFI, so why not jjust make it better lol. but carbs are way cheaper for the whole setup
302f150 is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:02 PM
  #5  
cassidymustang
4th Gear Member
 
cassidymustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,208
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

if you know how to do carb work, like tuning and rebuilding then i would go that way
cassidymustang is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:14 PM
  #6  
stangman94
4th Gear Member
 
stangman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,561
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

how much do you think a carbswap would run I've been thinking about doing the same thing?

And would you suggest staying efi if I'm gonna spray a 100 shot?
stangman94 is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:28 PM
  #7  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
samseed101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

Don't forget about emissions. Depending on how strict they are in your state, you may not be able to swap from EFI to carb.
samseed101 is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:37 PM
  #8  
stangman94
4th Gear Member
 
stangman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,561
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

no emissions here
stangman94 is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 03:46 PM
  #9  
cassidymustang
4th Gear Member
 
cassidymustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,208
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

yup no emissions. we are the motor city and they could care less about anything here. But i did hear that they might stop the smoking in restaurants here.
cassidymustang is offline  
Old 06-14-2007, 04:09 PM
  #10  
stangman94
4th Gear Member
 
stangman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,561
Default RE: Fuel Injection or Carbs???

I'm from detroit area to
stangman94 is offline  


Quick Reply: Fuel Injection or Carbs???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.