95_GT_Stang

I went through the same thing deciding which mustang to get. I decided on my '95 because I like the interior better, as well as I found one with only 22K original miles. I do love the way the foxes look though, but I am more than pleased with my car.

bobby

arent u only like 16 too?

Demon_Mustang

Look at my avatar, I love those big round fog lamps, lol.

Anyway, the 94-95 sn design just looks too plain and boring. But I would stick with 1992 and before, the 1993 one cannot be supercharged without a complete rebuild, and I think the 94-95 might be the same.

But the "boxy" style some people are talking crap about, in my opinion, looks far more masculine than the whole swanky curvy crap they did after that, no offense, but I think that too many curves without purpose looks too feminine. There are a few exceptions, like the Shelby Cobra, but in a way, even the Cobra looks feminine, but VERY SEXY! The sn's were just plain, non-sexy, women...

95_GT_Stang

19

bobby

oh ok wrong kid lol

87mustang347

i woodnt say they have more power, there just a little faster because, they dont have airbags and it was the forst yr to come out with mass air, save for the 88 cali stangs. so if u had all fox yr stangs that were stock, i guarentee u an 89 motch 5spd wood be the rest of them

bobby

i agree

five0

notchbackk fox all the way

91hatchgt

Like I said it looks like a car a mom would drive. Looks like they all have V6's ... Now, don't get me wrong, I know that's not true, but they look too girlie, and the roundness just looks like it belong under water.. Stay pre 94!

95_GT_Stang

I'm all about the old school stuff. I love the way my stang looks. If they all look like V6's, then it also gives them that sleeper look most people desire right? A stang isn't girlie unless you get pink polkadots on the side if you ask me.
Get whatever stang appeals to you most. They both have the 5.0 engine so you can make them fast pretty easily.