Stock against stock?
07-04-2007, 09:54 PM
#11
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 95
RE: Stock against stock?
my 93 roadmaster has beat many stock 5.0s in it's stock form. your 91 truck probably has the l-05 350 with 180 hp and 300 ft-lb torque. the torque curve is far better than 5.0l's torque curve. on the higher end i'd give the kill to the stang but from a dig i'd pass it to chevy products until about 65-75 mph.
07-04-2007, 10:23 PM
#12
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 84
RE: Stock against stock?
A stock 350 1500 is in no way faster than a 5.0 mustang especially a 5 speed mustang. Any of the automatic 350 1500's I have driven fall flat on their face after first gear.
KOMan: Must have one heck of a roadmaster to beat up on 5.0 mustangs. Cause my stock 87 5.0 pulls on my friends 96 9c1 LT1 caprice.
KOMan: Must have one heck of a roadmaster to beat up on 5.0 mustangs. Cause my stock 87 5.0 pulls on my friends 96 9c1 LT1 caprice.
07-04-2007, 10:43 PM
#13
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,897
RE: Stock against stock?
ORIGINAL: KOMan
my 93 roadmaster has beat many stock 5.0s in it's stock form. your 91 truck probably has the l-05 350 with 180 hp and 300 ft-lb torque. the torque curve is far better than 5.0l's torque curve. on the higher end i'd give the kill to the stang but from a dig i'd pass it to chevy products until about 65-75 mph.
my 93 roadmaster has beat many stock 5.0s in it's stock form. your 91 truck probably has the l-05 350 with 180 hp and 300 ft-lb torque. the torque curve is far better than 5.0l's torque curve. on the higher end i'd give the kill to the stang but from a dig i'd pass it to chevy products until about 65-75 mph.
07-05-2007, 01:08 AM
#16
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, NY
Posts: 3,333
RE: Stock against stock?
ORIGINAL: 89 fox
stock 1500 w/350= 15.7
stock stang w/302= 14.2
mustang should be a lot faster!
stock 1500 w/350= 15.7
stock stang w/302= 14.2
mustang should be a lot faster!
Ive never seen a stock 5.0 run 14.2.
Also any stock 1500 Ive seen ran high 16's or slower.
07-05-2007, 01:15 AM
#17
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
RE: Stock against stock?
A roadmaster as in buick beat a 5.0!!!??? I think not the 5.0 probably didn't even know you were racing. I'd spank no let me rephrase that obliterate your roadmaster with my nearly stock 5.0 92 notch.I'd suck that roadmaster through my intake a fart back out the tail pipes a blue oval!!! not even off the line would it be close.
07-05-2007, 01:38 AM
#18
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 95
RE: Stock against stock?
off the line up to about 65-75 mph i'd give the win to the buick still. above that to the fox. i'd take almost anyone up on that stock to stock, anyday, anytime. that 96 lt1 caprice might be the 4.3 V8 instead of the 5.7 V8 which makes a HUGE difference. my brother has a 96 with the 5.7 lt1 i'd give him the win up until about the same area then it's a slight fight til about 100. the b-bodies may be a large car but don't underestimate them. the torque curve is far better than that of the fox 5.0l. a well set-up car will beat-up on a slapdashed car anyday. although my fox is my dream car i can't say it was well thought out from the factory stock.
07-05-2007, 01:48 AM
#19
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BATON ROUGE
Posts: 1,262
RE: Stock against stock?
ORIGINAL: PJB
Where did you get the 14.2 for a stock 5.0? Mine with some light mods ran 15.3.
Ive never seen a stock 5.0 run 14.2.
Also any stock 1500 Ive seen ran high 16's or slower.
ORIGINAL: 89 fox
stock 1500 w/350= 15.7
stock stang w/302= 14.2
mustang should be a lot faster!
stock 1500 w/350= 15.7
stock stang w/302= 14.2
mustang should be a lot faster!
Ive never seen a stock 5.0 run 14.2.
Also any stock 1500 Ive seen ran high 16's or slower.
07-05-2007, 02:38 AM
#20
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 4,343
RE: Stock against stock?
ORIGINAL: LTnone
Roadmaster? As in Buick station wagon!? What were the 5.0s in, F250s??
ORIGINAL: KOMan
my 93 roadmaster has beat many stock 5.0s in it's stock form. your 91 truck probably has the l-05 350 with 180 hp and 300 ft-lb torque. the torque curve is far better than 5.0l's torque curve. on the higher end i'd give the kill to the stang but from a dig i'd pass it to chevy products until about 65-75 mph.
my 93 roadmaster has beat many stock 5.0s in it's stock form. your 91 truck probably has the l-05 350 with 180 hp and 300 ft-lb torque. the torque curve is far better than 5.0l's torque curve. on the higher end i'd give the kill to the stang but from a dig i'd pass it to chevy products until about 65-75 mph.
PJB I've seen bone stock mustang run a 13.7 on street tires and it was even a hatch.
