ANTICIVIC

Who do you guys think would win, an 90 non turbo stock auto 300zx, or a 94 gt auto stock?

91GT5.0

The stang, no question. I can beat Stock turbo 300ZX with my 91 5 spd GT by 2-3 cars

lloydchristmas

I can run faster than a 300z with no turbo

noslow50

Dumb ???? of course the stang

91GT5.0

<blockquote>Quote: Originally posted by 91GT5.0 on 24 March 2003<hr>
The stang, no question. I can beat Stock turbo 300ZX with my 91 5 spd GT by 2-3 cars

<hr></blockquote>



EDIT: Excuse me, that was when my car was STOCK except for the air silencer delete mod

DrifterX

Yeah..non turbos are garbage..

cornhusker85

300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though

86monster

definetly the gt the non turbo suck but the twin turbos are the ones you have to watch out for.

jeep45238

<blockquote>Quote: Originally posted by cornhusker85 on 31 March 2003<hr>
300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though



<hr></blockquote>



You're on crack boy.....

91GT5.0

<blockquote>Quote: Originally posted by cornhusker85 on 31 March 2003<hr>
300zx i beat plenty of stangs with my old 300zx now im looking at a 95 stang though



<hr></blockquote>

Your 300zx HAD to have been turboed, and then it would HAD to have aftermarket turbo's. I killed TT 300zx's in my stock GT. Especially on the freeway where I got more room