MustangForums.com

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

fastest stock 5.0

   
Old 08-23-2007, 08:00 PM
  #11  
tp65
2nd Gear Member
 
tp65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: memphis,TN
Posts: 366
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox?
tp65 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 08:33 PM
  #12  
CantStopTheFox...
4th Gear Member
 
CantStopTheFox...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,222
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
Check out these links...a Mustang History Lesson

http://www.mustangregistry.org/year.htm

http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history.htm
CantStopTheFox... is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 08:39 PM
  #13  
87gt5speed
 
87gt5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 34
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
an sn95 can't run low 14's because they are 250+ lb heavier than a fox. also i heard that they change the fireing order in 94 that resulted in a loss of power but i not 100% sure about that.
87gt5speed is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 08:52 PM
  #14  
Maxwelhse
4th Gear Member
 
Maxwelhse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,108
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
Alot of you guys need this book...

http://www.amazon.com/Official-Ford-...409&sr=8-1


Badly...
Maxwelhse is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 09:14 PM
  #15  
94StinkinLincoln
5th Gear Member
 
94StinkinLincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 2,763
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
firing order is the same, some foxes made a published 225hp, sn95 is 215. sn95 is about 300lbs heavier
94StinkinLincoln is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 09:33 PM
  #16  
stang8689
6th Gear Member
 
stang8689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Milford, Delaware
Posts: 5,464
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
93's should be faster cause the hypereutectic pistons are lighter than forged. Forged is better for a power adder but if going for stock it would be 93.
stang8689 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 09:36 PM
  #17  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: stang8689

93's should be faster cause the hypereutectic pistons are lighter than forged. Forged is better for a power adder but if going for stock it would be 93.
the pistons might be lighter, but remember they have air bags and mass air which weighs more..
primetime5.0 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 10:08 PM
  #18  
FullAuto
5th Gear Member
 
FullAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,760
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
87-88 5 speed coupes were the quickest stock (speed density and different cam).
FullAuto is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 10:26 PM
  #19  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: tp65

How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox?
because you cant drive....

I put my car into the 13's with just exhaust
AdderMk2 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-23-2007, 10:57 PM
  #20  
gearbanger
4th Gear Member
 
gearbanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,836
Default RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2

ORIGINAL: tp65

How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox?
because you cant drive....

I put my car into the 13's with just exhaust
one problem... you have a cobra
gearbanger is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: fastest stock 5.0


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.