5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

under-carb'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2007, 04:52 PM
  #11  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default RE: under-carb'd

Larger carbs CAN work, but itrequires a good carb with boosters that are extremely sensitive to metering signal. Newer modern carbs with recent booster designs are capable of pulling and effectively atomising fuel at less than 0.5" of vacuum. But, it requires you to a) know what the hell you're doing, b) have a good carb that's capable of working in that application and c) still have an appropriate cfmsize for the carb and engine you have. That being said, if you don't wanna spend that kinda money on a carb and get it tuned right, then 650 will be plenty. I'm only running 570 on my 302 and it's putting out 370+hp at the flywheel. A GOOD carburetor will always be better than a medicore one that's larger. Ultimately the key is to provide the proper AFR and have good atomization.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 08:29 PM
  #12  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: under-carb'd

You guy's know that by 'jetting' you are only changing the amount of gas into the engine, it has NO effect on how much air enters..........
tinman is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 AM.