turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
02-21-2005, 09:06 PM
#21
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,034
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
You wont be able to run 11:1 compression unless you have aluminum heads. If you are still using cast iron peices you will experiance detonation. And have to run a higher octane than 93, to prevent it. stick with 10:1 you can still add a centrifical blower with mild boost. Be careful your block can only with stand 600hp around there. I hope you are installing a mail girde on the mains while your at it.
02-21-2005, 09:20 PM
#22
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,802
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
ORIGINAL: Aixtreme89
You wont be able to run 11:1 compression unless you have aluminum heads. If you are still using cast iron peices you will experiance detonation. And have to run a higher octane than 93, to prevent it. stick with 10:1 you can still add a centrifical blower with mild boost. Be careful your block can only with stand 600hp around there. I hope you are installing a mail girde on the mains while your at it.
You wont be able to run 11:1 compression unless you have aluminum heads. If you are still using cast iron peices you will experiance detonation. And have to run a higher octane than 93, to prevent it. stick with 10:1 you can still add a centrifical blower with mild boost. Be careful your block can only with stand 600hp around there. I hope you are installing a mail girde on the mains while your at it.
nosman runs 12:1 on his 408 and i think its pump gassed (not sure)
you can run 11:1 safely if you have the correct timing adjustment, and by the way the stock block can only handle 500 HP not 600.
02-21-2005, 09:21 PM
#23
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 337
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
ORIGINAL: Aixtreme89
Stick with 9.5 compression pistons. If you plan on running a centrifical you could even go as high as 10:1 if you plan on running turbo or root or twin srew supercharger lower it. But anyways. You should be looking to get 347hp to the wheels if you consider 17% drivetrain loss if your making 430hp at the crank. But if this guy is putting this motor in a CRX those things weigh 200lbs. with driver which is about 7.1lbs. per horse power, if hes making 280hp. Your horse power to weight ratio is....10.6lbs. to every hp. Consider your car is 3700lbs. with driver. So if thats the case hes going to beat you. Why do you think CRX's can reach 9's. Just find out what car hes running and how much it weights and do the math before you commit to anything.
Stick with 9.5 compression pistons. If you plan on running a centrifical you could even go as high as 10:1 if you plan on running turbo or root or twin srew supercharger lower it. But anyways. You should be looking to get 347hp to the wheels if you consider 17% drivetrain loss if your making 430hp at the crank. But if this guy is putting this motor in a CRX those things weigh 200lbs. with driver which is about 7.1lbs. per horse power, if hes making 280hp. Your horse power to weight ratio is....10.6lbs. to every hp. Consider your car is 3700lbs. with driver. So if thats the case hes going to beat you. Why do you think CRX's can reach 9's. Just find out what car hes running and how much it weights and do the math before you commit to anything.
02-21-2005, 09:38 PM
#24
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,034
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
Yo Bro.... Open your eyes. http://www.l-natural.com/crx.htm
Naturally asperated in the 10's...just think of what a boosted crx runs. They are light so they dont need as much power as we do to make the same numbers. Do the math. I have a respect for anyone into cars. Imports and domestics. As long as they are gearheads, and dont talk out of there ***. There ok with me. Everyone has a different view and opinion.
Naturally asperated in the 10's...just think of what a boosted crx runs. They are light so they dont need as much power as we do to make the same numbers. Do the math. I have a respect for anyone into cars. Imports and domestics. As long as they are gearheads, and dont talk out of there ***. There ok with me. Everyone has a different view and opinion.
02-21-2005, 09:48 PM
#25
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,034
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
Here ya go......Honda CRX to a run of 9.93 seconds at 134 mph
Thats naturally asperated mind you.
the articles down this page a little.....Bro.
http://www.spcperformance.com/PerfGa...RaceIntro.html
Thats naturally asperated mind you.
the articles down this page a little.....Bro.
http://www.spcperformance.com/PerfGa...RaceIntro.html
02-21-2005, 09:54 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
ORIGINAL: Ezrider
i dont like hondas, but iv had them surpise me, however iv never seen one run anything faster than low 13's you should be in the 12's with your mod list. the fwd will realy hurt your freind, i think you beat him
i dont like hondas, but iv had them surpise me, however iv never seen one run anything faster than low 13's you should be in the 12's with your mod list. the fwd will realy hurt your freind, i think you beat him
I think that you'll get him with a 347 stroker honestly. He sounds like a punk *** kid, and most punk *** kids can't drive to save their life.
ya but the prob is this guy is building b-18,which is 1.8 l..same engine outta i believe 98-99 crv's.twin overhead cam with v-tec
He's using a B18c more than likely. Came out of the 94-01 Integra GSR/97,98,00,01 ITR.
Edit:
ORIGINAL: vfast
these what if's are such bull sh it....just race and find out..what the hell is the fun if you know your going to win
these what if's are such bull sh it....just race and find out..what the hell is the fun if you know your going to win
02-23-2005, 08:28 AM
#27
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 3,451
RE: turbo honda vs 347 stroker comparison??
ORIGINAL: Aixtreme89
Yo Bro.... Open your eyes. http://www.l-natural.com/crx.htm
Naturally asperated in the 10's...just think of what a boosted crx runs. They are light so they dont need as much power as we do to make the same numbers. Do the math. I have a respect for anyone into cars. Imports and domestics. As long as they are gearheads, and dont talk out of there ***. There ok with me. Everyone has a different view and opinion.
ORIGINAL: 16FoxBody
are u kidding me bro? a CRX run 9's NEVER seen or heard of that in my life. The race should be close. If your in a LX or hatch itll be close, notchback ull burn him. vert ull prolly tie. U drive right you should beat him, g/l cant wait for the vid
are u kidding me bro? a CRX run 9's NEVER seen or heard of that in my life. The race should be close. If your in a LX or hatch itll be close, notchback ull burn him. vert ull prolly tie. U drive right you should beat him, g/l cant wait for the vid
Naturally asperated in the 10's...just think of what a boosted crx runs. They are light so they dont need as much power as we do to make the same numbers. Do the math. I have a respect for anyone into cars. Imports and domestics. As long as they are gearheads, and dont talk out of there ***. There ok with me. Everyone has a different view and opinion.
ORIGINAL: vfast
these what if's are such bull sh it....just race and find out..what the hell is the fun if you know your going to win
these what if's are such bull sh it....just race and find out..what the hell is the fun if you know your going to win
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
302, 347, 390, 50, 95, comparison, engine, ford, honda, mustang, stang, stroker, supercharged, turbo, turbocharged
