5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2003, 08:28 PM
  #1  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa



Ya remember when I wrote that thread about how my car had 370 hp. Ya I was wrong I forgot about the 15 % loss through drivetrain and everything my bad. Its prolly around 280 RWHP. What you guys think ? Cept that motorused 1.6 roller rockers, heddmen headers, and rpm intake. (-Mine has the rpm "air gap" intake 1.7 RRs , and hook super comp headers-) </P>


<IMG src=uploads/T5superduty/FCZ7B_370hp_358_torque.JPG border="0"></P>


Ford racing 5.0 long block, Gt40 X heads, B-303 Cam, Crane Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock RPM "Air Gap" intake, Road Demon 625 cfm carb, Flo-tech exhaust, Hooker Super competition Headers, Super Duty T5 @ 2500 lbs</P><edited><editID>T5superduty</editID><editDate>37910.7837731481</editDate></edited>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 10-16-2003, 08:36 PM
  #2  
allblack
2nd Gear Member
 
allblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 277
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

yea i agree that sounds about right to me.
allblack is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 03:09 PM
  #3  
horatio102
4th Gear Member
 
horatio102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: B'ham, WA
Posts: 1,484
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

I read an article that hashed about that drivetrain loss. For FWD manual they figured 15%, for RWD it was 17%, and for autos a lot higher.

Even with 15% loss, 280 hp is only 322 at the crank.
horatio102 is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 03:18 PM
  #4  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa



Originally Posted by horatio102
I read an article that hashed about that drivetrain loss. For FWD manual they figured 15%, for RWD it was 17%, and for autos a lot higher.

Even with 15% loss, 280 hp is only 322 at the crank.
</P>


If you had 370 hp at the flywheel x 85% would be 314.5 rwhp. Still higher than I would think it would be. 280 at the wheels sounds about right, that would be around 330 hp at the flywheel.</P>
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 04:54 PM
  #5  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

oh yea and <SPAN class=bold>mdvaldosta my friend had a 1984 capri 5.0 with only JBA headers and exhaust and he would smoke stock fuel injected 5.0s all the time. They dont run like 86-95 or whatever on 6 cyl they run pretty good</SPAN>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 05:04 PM
  #6  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa



5.0L 302 2-Bbl F 8.4:1 139 hp @ 3600 250 ft/lb @ 1800 (49 state)</P>


Those are the stats on your friends motor stock. Hmmm 139 hp? Even with headers and exhaust I doubt he could smoke a moped. If I were you I would try to be carefulabout disagreeing with me.</P>
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 05:12 PM
  #7  
Sean
3rd Gear Member
 
Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 893
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

Ouch!

Actually my bro in law had a 83 RS capri, that thing was quick(after all the mods)<img border="0" src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0">
Sean is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 07:18 PM
  #8  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa



Well with only headers and exhaust his best time was a 15 flat no lie! There not 2 barrols lol And it was 175 hp @ 4200and 245 lb-ft @ 2400 4v. Yes down about 50 horspower"rated" but they still could run... just like my friends did. so dont <IMG src=smileys/smiley19.gif border="0"> </P>


Be carefull of disagreeing with you???.. s**tt shut the hell up little kid. I hate you little s**tts who think your so bad **** over the internet. I suggest that you just sit tight you litte punk cause you wouldnt want to meet me in person. And on top of all this you are way wrong. Where did you find the figure of it making 139 horsepower anyway. The motor with some exhaust mods such as headers and other things brought the horsepower up to 205 they just didnt do it that year but a little later. Which his had JBA headers and cat back exhaust system so dont you try to tell me how it is.</P><edited><editID>T5superduty</editID><editDate>37911.7338194444</editDate></edited>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 09:02 PM
  #9  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

once again...i wonder...why is it the dumbest people always use physical strength as an argument?
Jugador1 is offline  
Old 10-17-2003, 09:20 PM
  #10  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa

All in all <SPAN class=bold>mdvaldosta </SPAN>started the hole thing saying "I should be carefull.".. like what should I be scared of some person living really far away which couldnt do anything anyway.. give me a break. I cant just let people who dont know what they are talking about get away with it
T5superduty is offline  


Quick Reply: Remember ? My horsepower ?I wa



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.