5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Windsor vs Clevaland?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2005, 09:11 PM
  #1  
SNORX302
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
SNORX302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 140
Default Windsor vs Clevaland?

Anyone know the difference between a 351 Clevaland and a 351 Windsor? Also on a side question a 347 stroker with gt40 P heads-does it sound achievable of 400+ HP?
SNORX302 is offline  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:55 PM
  #2  
Chris C
2nd Gear Member
 
Chris C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 280
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

The cleveland and windsor are two completely diff motors. The parts are not interchangable. My buddy has a 351 cleveland in his 71 mach1 mustang and parts for it are not as easy to come by as the windsors and cost more. The 351W are more or less like the 302 with a taller deck. I think the last clevelands came out in the 70s and the last 351 I think was in the late 90s in the f-series.
Chris C is offline  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:11 PM
  #3  
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
mkspeed26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,392
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

yes a 347 is capable of 400 hp, but the cam would have to be pretty radical. it would be much easier with a 351. out of the 2 i would suggest a 351W. easier to get parts for
mkspeed26 is offline  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:36 PM
  #4  
92GTVertible
 
92GTVertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

Yes, the two 351's are very different. I have a 351c in my 73 Mach and am very happy with the performance. I have also driven rides with the 351w and those were fun rides too. For a small car where room under the hood is at a minimum and excess weight is a concern, the windsor is the best bet. For a larger car, I think the Cleveland is a better choice. I could be wrong but IMHO I think the Cleveland will take more abuse than the Windsor. I think there is also a difference in the porting of the heads with the advantage going to the Cleveland.
92GTVertible is offline  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:38 PM
  #5  
Chris C
2nd Gear Member
 
Chris C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 280
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

Got a pic of that 73?
Chris C is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 11:24 AM
  #6  
92GTVertible
 
92GTVertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

I have pic's but they seem to be too big to upload here. I guess that's appropriate since the car is so big!

Give me your addr and I'll send them to you.

I'll see if I can lower the resolution and post here later.
92GTVertible is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 11:48 AM
  #7  
92GTVertible
 
92GTVertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

Here's one of my 73 Mach. I've had the car since 1977. I'm the 2nd owner.

I had the factory alum mags off the car when the pic was taken. I have to drill out the screws in the center caps to get some new tires mounted.



[IMG]local://upfiles/10486/9C62CF388A294A798E4EEAD4ED31504C.jpg[/IMG]
92GTVertible is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:22 PM
  #8  
fastfox86
2nd Gear Member
 
fastfox86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 316
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

You can squeeze 400 hp out a 302 block easily enough. It shouldn't be too hard with on a 347 with the right combo
fastfox86 is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:35 PM
  #9  
Chris C
2nd Gear Member
 
Chris C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 280
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

Very nice mach 92. Wanna sell it?
Chris C is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 05:17 PM
  #10  
92GTVertible
 
92GTVertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
Default RE: Windsor vs Clevaland?

Thanks for the compliment! I sure have put a lot of time in it over the years. I'm planning on keeping it for now. It's got an older ground-up restoration but still looks really good. It just turned over 100k last summer.

I've been looking for a project car for my son who is currently learning to drive. I picked up a 92 GT convertible stick for him that was in really great shape, 92k & new tires for 3,500. Well it was supposed to be for him anyway. After I test drove the GT I had to get that for myself. That's a bit tooooo fast and tooooo fun to drive for someone just getting a license. Maybe in a few more years... NAW! I've been driving it daily in good weather but am going to paint it this spring.

You guys are right about the parts for the Windsor being easier to come by. The Cleveland parts can be found but sometimes you really have to search for some items. The salvage yards in this area have been picked pretty clean.
92GTVertible is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM
NeoTokyo
SVT Forums
4
03-25-2005 03:19 AM
87GT hatch
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
7
11-23-2004 02:19 PM



Quick Reply: Windsor vs Clevaland?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.