highway shimy
#15
highway shimy
so since a guy ran nitrous it bent the axles huh?? u can have just as much power w/ just motor or w/ superchargers or turbos as u can w/ nitrous. but it was the fault of having nitrous that bent the axles.... weird...
#16
highway shimy
i own that 1.8T that jaybird claims to beat and i have to tell you that he definitely doesn't tear me to pieces.....but neither car is the clear winner......iy is on a launch by launch basis.....until we both build our motors and then i will win.
and i have to tell you that a 2002 1.8T will hand a 2002 VR6 it's a** in a race, it's not even close.
and i have to tell you that a 2002 1.8T will hand a 2002 VR6 it's a** in a race, it's not even close.
#17
highway shimy
Well the problem with those damn FWD cars is if you get close to 300hp your gonna start breaking axles. My friend had a CRX with a superchager (still pretty slow when racing my other friends Mustang) and he broke axles if he launched to hard. Ohh, and I would like to see your 1.8 do teh 1/4 mile in under 13 secs!
#19
highway shimy
To clarify the situation, this data is straight from the car and driver website
The following is a writeup comparing the VW v-6 to the 1.8L
"The V-6 is 0.2 second quicker than the 1.8T at 10-mph increments through 50. At 60 mph, it's 0.4 second ahead and extends its advantage to half a second through the quarter-mile."
The following are stats on the 1.8L
Displacement. . . . . . . . . . .109 cu in, 1781cc
Power (SAE net). . . . . . . . . . .150 bhp @ 5700 rpm
Torque (SAE net). . . . . . . . 155 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm
Transmission. . 5-speed manual
Curb weight. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2881 lb
Zero to 60 mph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.3 sec
Standing 1/4-mile. . . . . . . . . 15.9 sec @ 88 mph
Top speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131 mph
Now here is the BEST PART!!!
My (completely stock) 2002 Dodge Dakota Sport with a 4.7L will do the quarter in 15.0 all day long with consistancy!!! Imagine that, a pickup beating the HELL out of a "Bad" little 1.8 VW.
p.s. I will be glad to prove it @ RT 66 Raceway.
The following is a writeup comparing the VW v-6 to the 1.8L
"The V-6 is 0.2 second quicker than the 1.8T at 10-mph increments through 50. At 60 mph, it's 0.4 second ahead and extends its advantage to half a second through the quarter-mile."
The following are stats on the 1.8L
Displacement. . . . . . . . . . .109 cu in, 1781cc
Power (SAE net). . . . . . . . . . .150 bhp @ 5700 rpm
Torque (SAE net). . . . . . . . 155 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm
Transmission. . 5-speed manual
Curb weight. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2881 lb
Zero to 60 mph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.3 sec
Standing 1/4-mile. . . . . . . . . 15.9 sec @ 88 mph
Top speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131 mph
Now here is the BEST PART!!!
My (completely stock) 2002 Dodge Dakota Sport with a 4.7L will do the quarter in 15.0 all day long with consistancy!!! Imagine that, a pickup beating the HELL out of a "Bad" little 1.8 VW.
p.s. I will be glad to prove it @ RT 66 Raceway.