5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2005, 05:52 PM
  #1  
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 543
Default 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Hey just wondering what the basic hp and torque of these engine's are? And if there are any real problem's with these moter's and what would be the least expensive to do. looking into doing one.
95_302_StangMan is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 06:25 PM
  #2  
SDelgado87
1st Gear Member
 
SDelgado87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 65
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

I believe the 302 is rated at 215-225 HP if that helps any

Also I heard the 347 has an oil burning issue...
SDelgado87 is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:04 PM
  #3  
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
OneGearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 5,867
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

ORIGINAL: SDelgado87

I believe the 302 is rated at 215-225 HP if that helps any

Also I heard the 347 has an oil burning issue...
used to......most of the companies have fixed 'em....i KNOW CHP doesnt have oil burning issues anymore............at least i dont think so.....

and ive heard usually, its like 1hp per cubic inch usually when its got a good set of heads and exhaust and the goodies, but, im not promising nothing, so, dont hold me to it
OneGearhead is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:09 PM
  #4  
90Mustangfan
I ♥ Acer
 
90Mustangfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,259
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

the oil burning problem for the 347 is still there, now they start burning oil at 50,000 miles instead of 30,000 miles, as before. they temorally fixed it. it just last longer with out burning oil...
90Mustangfan is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:14 PM
  #5  
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
OneGearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 5,867
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

ohhh. ok. either way, i can deal with some oil burning for the gobs of torque you get out of a 347
OneGearhead is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:18 PM
  #6  
C/Note
I ♥ Acer
 
C/Note's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,913
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

306 is just a bored 30 over 302... if i take off 2 plug wires .i got a 306...
C/Note is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 01:34 AM
  #7  
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
94Cbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Kentucky
Posts: 1,487
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

ORIGINAL: 90Mustangfan

the oil burning problem for the 347 is still there, now they start burning oil at 50,000 miles instead of 30,000 miles, as before. they temorally fixed it. it just last longer with out burning oil...
Actually the reason a 347 used to burn oil was because the wristpin interfeared with the oil ring. The old 347s burned oil all the time because of this. From the time you turned your fresh 347 over for the first time, the oil burning was happening. It wasnt a wear issue, it was a design issue, so milage didnt matter. Coast High Performance's 347 kits burn NO oil due to an innovative piston design. They guarntee their 347's will run just as long and trouble free as their 331's. The life expectancy of both engines is 100,000 miles. The owner of CHP said the only reason he still offers the 331 is because so many people are still gunshy of the 347.
94Cbra is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 03:17 AM
  #8  
Magiarn71
3rd Gear Member
 
Magiarn71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 646
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Someone posted something somewhere about the oiling issue really being about the increased angle of the rod /piston on the longer throw crank. Any truth to that?
Magiarn71 is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 10:23 AM
  #9  
hawkwitastang
 
hawkwitastang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 41
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

yeah well a bored 30 over 302 is still fun to play with thats what I've got and it has plenty of adrenaline inducing power and torque though I don't know the numbers
ORIGINAL: NOS/408

306 is just a bored 30 over 302... if i take off 2 plug wires .i got a 306...
hawkwitastang is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 11:32 AM
  #10  
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 543
Default RE: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347

Hey thanks for the info so far, also i have heard that with the new 347 kit's they dont burn oil, one more question so what do you guys think is a better moter 331 or 347 with the oil issue apart and which reqires less work and money?
95_302_StangMan is offline  


Quick Reply: 302 vs 306 vs 331 vs 347



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM.