5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

347 or 331

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2009, 01:54 AM
  #11  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default

you have a 304 bored .040 over?
w8less is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:18 AM
  #12  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

...I would go 331
Timspony is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 08:40 AM
  #13  
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
ctgreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

Originally Posted by timspony
...I would go 331
and now the great debate begins. lol.
whats your reasoning?
ctgreddy is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 10:57 AM
  #14  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default

Originally Posted by timspony
...I would go 331
please elaborate on why....
w8less is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 11:24 AM
  #15  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

....I see a lot more people running 331's with a turbo/SC set-up...my feeling (and its mine) is that a 347 has been "traditionally" a NA set-up...It's only my opinion...being honest, I'd rather go 351W!

...so do you like apples or oranges better?
Timspony is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 12:26 PM
  #16  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
AdderMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

people turbo and s/c their 331 b/c its lacking the power they would have had with a 347... My 347 is happy being N/A, and I am happy with the power it makes
AdderMk2 is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 02:51 PM
  #17  
91 Fox 331
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
91 Fox 331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 53
Default

no the 304 was a typo i didnt catch it untill today.
Ive just been wondering about this because two of my friends have a 331 and then a 347. The 331 has twin 68mm and is runnin the new Boss block with Twisted Wedge heads and a custom valve train on this thing. he is makin over 1000.

Now the 347 is pretty much just that. he said it makes about 340 at the tire and im just shy of that with my 302. His car is set up for road racing and he is putting a turbo on this winter.

What i am curious about is which bottom end would hold up better to 10-15 lbs of boost or more, because the thought of a 460 even crossed my mind.
91 Fox 331 is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 03:06 PM
  #18  
99BlackPonyGT
aka 'Negative Nancy'
 
99BlackPonyGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,839
Default

Originally Posted by 91 Fox 331
460 even crossed my mind.
now youre winning!
99BlackPonyGT is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 03:12 PM
  #19  
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
ctgreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

if you equally build a 331 and a 347 with the same level of parts i think they'd both take the same amount of boost. 10-15lbs isn't much for a built motor. so i'd go with a 347 and have more power from the get go.
ctgreddy is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:12 PM
  #20  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

whenn you start boosting a stroker, I'd be more concerned with a solid foundation that it be built upon = aftermarket block
mjr46 is offline  


Quick Reply: 347 or 331



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 PM.