MustangForums.com

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Disappointing Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2009, 09:53 PM
  #21  
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
grabbem88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
Default
anything else just ask...


advice...do a compression test..and a vacuum test..
grabbem88 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:18 PM
  #22  
turbosha
3rd Gear Member
 
turbosha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tn
Posts: 900
Default
Originally Posted by grabbem88
have you put a 90mm on your ride?

and t-body and a carb are totally different animals
no i dont need to. and they both meter and connected to the throttle pedal.whatever
turbosha is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:25 PM
  #23  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default
maybe mine was a freak? I made 380/430 on a 347 with trickflow high ports, xe274, systemax, shorty headers, 75mm maf, 70mm tb etc..
primetime5.0 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:40 PM
  #24  
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
grabbem88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
Default
one is wet and one is dry flow..then the fuel one is volume and one is by pressure.

so you believe cfm is based on cubic inches?...what about VE? runner length? cross section? cylinder pressure? vacuum?

just get off the op's topic,cause you are no help and have no clue what is going on with his motor..
grabbem88 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:42 PM
  #25  
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
grabbem88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
Default
Originally Posted by primetime5.0
maybe mine was a freak? I made 380/430 on a 347 with trickflow high ports, xe274, systemax, shorty headers, 75mm maf, 70mm tb etc..
it was the high ports...i had that cam btw..and it wasn't too bad at all..
grabbem88 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:45 PM
  #26  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default
Originally Posted by grabbem88
it was the high ports...i had that cam btw..and it wasn't too bad at all..
thats what im leaning towards.. funny thing is most people dont use them.. I dont know why
primetime5.0 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:49 PM
  #27  
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
grabbem88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
Default
cause they don't freak'n listen,and perty much lose there butt's off against car's who have less<in there eyes
grabbem88 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:52 PM
  #28  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default
Originally Posted by grabbem88
cause they don't freak'n listen,and perty much lose there butt's off against car's who have less<in there eyes
lol, we'll see how the do after being ported.. anyways enough of the thread hijack.. pm me G if you wanna chat
primetime5.0 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2009, 10:58 PM
  #29  
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
grabbem88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
Default
yeah i still got your yahoo!...


back to topic sorry 89coupe
grabbem88 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Borla ATAK not louder than S-type (Stinger)
2007CalSpec
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
12-13-2020 11:42 AM
USA Today Weighs in on 2016 Mustang VS Camaro Numbers
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-23-2015 01:28 PM
Steeda’s Vortech S550 Goes 11.2 on Street Tires in Road Race Trim
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-16-2015 07:53 PM
ford 289
ryland
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-13-2015 12:35 PM
Evolution Performance Car Show/Dyno Day 9/12/15
The01Cav
North East
0
09-05-2015 03:39 PM
Tags
Back to Subforum
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
View Next Unread
Transmission and Rearend Gurus I need Your Help




Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Disappointing Dyno Numbers


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.