5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Exhaust/ Back pressure question

Old 08-16-2009, 09:50 PM
  #11  
TrimDrip
FudgeDrip
 
TrimDrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: `
Posts: 3,101
Default

I don't see where dumps are going to make a whole lot of difference as long as the exhaust before it is large enough, besides being extremely loud.

Last edited by TrimDrip; 08-16-2009 at 09:57 PM.
TrimDrip is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 10:17 AM
  #12  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
I was trying to speak more generally, rather than specifically to any particular engine combination. Though the primary tuning component in the exhaust is the header(primaries and collector), when attached to pipes after that, it becomes necessary to evacuate gasses from those pipes quickly enough to prevent them from backing up and having an effect on tuning at the collector. Larger diameter pipes may help or may hurt, it depends on the rest of the system and the engine itself(like you said, it's not divorced from the engine). If the pipes are so large that velocity drops off too radically, it can cause gasses to back up. Yes, increasing velocity comes from increasing restriction(in terms of pipe diameter), but like I said, the trick is to balance the best velocity with the best overall flow. Too small and you strangle the exhaust, too big and you can lose some efficiency in the overall system. There's 2 components at work, reduced restriction from larger pipes, and reduced restriction from higher velocity.
THERE is the area of disagreement. .... the misconception that too big of an exhaust pipe will cause gases to become stagnant within the confines of the system and cause them to be "pushed" creating a scavenging problem. It doesn't work that way, otherwise a backpressure increase reading would show up when checked, and it doesn't.

If you look at the dynamics of the enclosed gases, the added cooling effect a big pipe has on the exhaust stream alone, helps scavenging + reduces the possibility of having turbulence generated..... think about what happens to a stream of gas molecules when they are cooled..... inertia, momentum, contraction.

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
The pulse tuning is primarily affected by header design(primary diameter, length, collector size, length, how they blend etc). Gas velocity won't really effect pulse tuning other than determining the original strength of the pulse when it's generated at a diameter change in the system, mainly when the exhaust gas initially exists the cylinder and creates a pressure wave spike.
Nope..... in an enclosed system, you cannot divorce sections of the piping. If you generate an exhaust pulse from cylinder #1, to affect scavenging of cylinder #4, and you already have the system "velocity primed"..... that pulse will be dampened at the header collector, and the restriction will generate a little reversion. Something like a the 2-cycle setup, where the exhaust is setup to cause a reversion pulse using sonic energy.......



Originally Posted by 67mustang302
But like you said, it all comes down to how the whole system works together. That's why the F1 and Cup guys spend so much time on the dyno just to build an exhaust system...searching for the ideal diameter, ideal length, the most power. For us, unless we have a set of headers custom built, we're stuck with an off the shelf header design, that can only put power in the ballpark of where we want it.
.... but you don't see them focusing on velocity........



And you're also correct, us "regular Joe's" are limited to OTS headers offerings, another reason why past the flange of the header, is where the exhaust tuning opportunities are...... BTSTDT with "stingers" or tuning extensions..... and they always require pipe ID to be increased to ensure proper pulse scavenging.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:36 AM
  #13  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

.......here we go again.........
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 01:11 PM
  #14  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine...technology.htm

Some interesting reading. Based on the current developments in Cup, F1 and Moto-GP racing.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 08-18-2009, 02:05 PM
  #15  
Five0hFox
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Five0hFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 766
Default

Oh boy lol. All this discussion from one simple question haha
Five0hFox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
09-20-2022 01:04 AM
MXBT187
General Tech
2
08-20-2015 02:36 AM
69FB
Audio/Visual Electronics
2
08-18-2015 08:50 PM
mweiland
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
08-16-2015 10:59 AM
Mnuckolls
4.0L V6 Technical Discussions
3
08-09-2015 08:54 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Exhaust/ Back pressure question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.