5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

5.0 to 2.3?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2009, 03:04 AM
  #1  
60trimGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
60trimGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
Default 5.0 to 2.3?!

yes how possible is it to drop a turbo 2.3 engine into a 91 gt? whats needed and will the stock AOD bolt up to it?
60trimGT is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:12 AM
  #2  
motorman524
MF Informant
 
motorman524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Default

The AOD will not bolt up. You will need an A4LD if you want to stick with an auto. You can use the same rear but you will need a different driveshaft(I believe). turbo 2.3, harness(depends on mass air or map), reroute fuel lines. I'm sure I am missing something. Why would do that? That would be a lot of work with nothing to show for it.
motorman524 is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:16 AM
  #3  
60trimGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
60trimGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by motorman524
The AOD will not bolt up. You will need an A4LD if you want to stick with an auto. You can use the same rear but you will need a different driveshaft(I believe). turbo 2.3, harness(depends on mass air or map), reroute fuel lines. I'm sure I am missing something. Why would do that? That would be a lot of work with nothing to show for it.
i'd be better of buying an svo then?
the reason is to do something different
60trimGT is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:20 AM
  #4  
motorman524
MF Informant
 
motorman524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Default

yeah, just buy an SVO. They aren't cheap though.
How would that be different? there are tons turboed 4's running around.
motorman524 is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:21 AM
  #5  
motorman524
MF Informant
 
motorman524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Default

I guess you could buy a tbird turbo coupe and swap everything as well.
motorman524 is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 03:21 AM
  #6  
60trimGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
60trimGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by motorman524
yeah, just buy an SVO. They aren't cheap though.
How would that be different? there are tons turboed 4's running around.
i meant different as in i have never heard of someone going from a perfectly good heads/cam 302 to a turbo 2.3
60trimGT is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:34 AM
  #7  
Styg
1st Gear Member
 
Styg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by 60trimGT
i meant different as in i have never heard of someone going from a perfectly good heads/cam 302 to a turbo 2.3
Thats not different mate, thats just plain stupid.
Styg is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 05:07 PM
  #8  
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
FoxGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 3,451
Default

the stock a4ld won't hold up well to it. Some people have ran a c4 using an older pinto bellhousing. I ran a t5 for mine because it holds up to quite a bit if treated right. They use a vam instead of a maf. Not such a good thing, but it got the job done. Some people have switched over to using a maf. I personally went the standalone route & ditched the air meter all together for less inlet restrictions so mine is setup as speed density. You would need the pistons, computer, engine harness, & air meter from a 2.3t car. The rest of the parts can be had from a n/a 2.3, you'll need the fuel lines too (they come out on the drivers side instead of passenger like the v8). The weak link to the n/a engines is the pistons. Everything else will hold up to around 400hp, some have pushed it above (there's actually a guy on this forum running around 540whp with the stock bottom end). The stock n/a pistons will give out around 5psi. The 2.3t itself is pretty well bulletproof.

The big problem with the 4 cylinder is the head. A good aftermarket aluminum one will set you back $2000 which is pretty crazy. Boport is a pretty recognized company for porting the stockers (aswell as aftermarket ones) getting them in the 400+ hp range

http://www.stinger-performance.com/bolton.html This guy is running one.

I had the chance to buy an svo for $1000. The reason I turned it down is because of their value, I knew I was going to end up modifying the car, so I bought a notchback & put a 2.3t in it. After I got a 351w I ended up swapping the 2.3 into my ranger for a quick work truck. Personally I'd just buy a junk mustang with a blown engine or something for it. The low end power is nice to play around with sometimes.

Last edited by FoxGT; 10-21-2009 at 05:12 PM.
FoxGT is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 05:25 PM
  #9  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default

Turbo the 5.0 instead.
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 05:31 PM
  #10  
Dj_Seph
4th Gear Member
 
Dj_Seph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,127
Default

The above wins.
Dj_Seph is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 to 2.3?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.