5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Fored Induction...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2009, 11:35 PM
  #11  
STROKED_LX
1st Gear Member
 
STROKED_LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
85-92 forged............not true, plenty of high milage 5.0's out there running 12-15 psi.....it's all in the tune
Ok thanks for correcting i didnt know about the 85/86's stangs

Reason i said high mileage for someone with worn rings.
STROKED_LX is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:56 AM
  #12  
TopNotch89
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
TopNotch89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 328
Default

i would be much less of a headache to run a procharger/vortec/powerdyne etc then a turbo right? simply because its bascially a bolt on? as with a turbo youd have to run intercooler piping right? If your running 10psi on a vortec can you get impressive gains similar to a turbo?
TopNotch89 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 01:03 AM
  #13  
TrimDrip
FudgeDrip
 
TrimDrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: `
Posts: 3,101
Default

a turbo is so much cooler though
TrimDrip is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:03 AM
  #14  
TopNotch89
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
TopNotch89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 328
Default

indeed it is, i think the only option i would have is one of the cheaper turbo kits i could find. i know the ebay ones are in my ballpark, but ive heard okay and bad things about them on here...whats bad about them? the turbos are junk?
TopNotch89 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:25 AM
  #15  
FivePointOhh
in limbo
 
FivePointOhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,300
Default

my neighbor did a DIY turbo on 11 psi on 155,000 mile motor iirc and layed close to 400 to the wheels. i think the tuner said he could have taken it to 16psi but my neighbor was building the car to sell it and make profit. turbo is way kooler IMO
FivePointOhh is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 06:41 PM
  #16  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default

Originally Posted by TopNotch89
i would be much less of a headache to run a procharger/vortec/powerdyne etc then a turbo right? simply because its bascially a bolt on? as with a turbo youd have to run intercooler piping right? If your running 10psi on a vortec can you get impressive gains similar to a turbo?
Mine's intercooled
PRO50SC is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 07:15 PM
  #17  
sadface
2nd Gear Member
 
sadface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 334
Default

i always wanted to do a twin turbo setup for my old fox
sadface is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:05 PM
  #18  
TopNotch89
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
TopNotch89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 328
Default

i wouldnt want twins...just a single. This is very tempting. Can anyone touch base with pros and cons of a centrifugal supercharger over a single turbo. I know with the supercharger its instant power because you dont have to wait for spooling, although with a small turbo itll spool pretty quick. How hard is it to run intercooler piping for a turbo or supercharger? and im really not looking to make over 400 hp. i wouldnt want to test pushing the limit of the stock block, theyre only good to 450 correct? and the 351 is more like 600?
TopNotch89 is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 03:54 PM
  #19  
TopNotch89
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
TopNotch89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 328
Default

anyone else?
TopNotch89 is offline  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:19 PM
  #20  
steel1
2nd Gear Member
 
steel1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 308
Default

https://mustangforums.com/forum/pipe...formation.html Here you go.
steel1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Fored Induction...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.