What does this mean? - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

What does this mean?

Reply

 
 
 
Old 11-30-2011, 08:34 PM
  #11  
AdderMk2
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
Default

Originally Posted by im_stuck_in_iraq View Post
Specs? $?
did you really ask that? Did you think to click on the link in my sig?
AdderMk2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 09:34 PM
  #12  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Think of it this way that intake will be a storage point on the stock engine the airflow will crawl thru that gapping void because it moves tons more air that you can use! Like said plan save build!
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 01:45 PM
  #13  
im_stuck_in_iraq
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
im_stuck_in_iraq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beloit, Wisconsin
Posts: 362
Smile hmm

Originally Posted by Venomantidote95 View Post
Think of it this way that intake will be a storage point on the stock engine the airflow will crawl thru that gapping void because it moves tons more air that you can use! Like said plan save build!
im not a good saver lol

ill just get bbk 70mm tb and performer II intake eventually heads cam and shorty headers
im_stuck_in_iraq is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 01:47 PM
  #14  
im_stuck_in_iraq
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
im_stuck_in_iraq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beloit, Wisconsin
Posts: 362
Smile thanks

Originally Posted by mjr46 View Post
if your gonna supercharge, an rpm 2 intake will be plenty and still retain drivibility, the s/c will make up any shortcomings with boost, trust me, I have a s/c vert or did..lol until I blew it up, non need for victor stuff on a s/c stock blocked motor, you'll have plenty to split it with boost
Thanks

looks like bbk 70 mm tb and rpm II is in my near future THANKS AGAIN
im_stuck_in_iraq is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 04:02 PM
  #15  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Thats a much better choice that will work ok with stock engines... You may still loose a small bit of lowend tq but nothing a gear swap cant offset!
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 09:37 AM
  #16  
im_stuck_in_iraq
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
im_stuck_in_iraq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beloit, Wisconsin
Posts: 362
Smile

Originally Posted by Venomantidote95 View Post
Thats a much better choice that will work ok with stock engines... You may still loose a small bit of lowend tq but nothing a gear swap cant offset!
i already have 3.73 gears
im_stuck_in_iraq is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 11:56 AM
  #17  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Ok then your good to go.
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
 
 
 

Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory