390's .... VS ..... 410's
10-02-2005, 07:32 PM
#3
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
RE: 390's .... VS ..... 410's
personally i would of ditched that exhaust. losing bp and going with gears. gears dont make up for the loss of bp. get some type of backpressure and car will run alot better
10-03-2005, 01:46 AM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 522
RE: 390's .... VS ..... 410's
ORIGINAL: 95whitecobra
I've had 4.10's before. They are real nice from a stop. HWY driving in 5th wasn't too bad either. On local roads, I would always drive one gear higher than needed.
I've had 4.10's before. They are real nice from a stop. HWY driving in 5th wasn't too bad either. On local roads, I would always drive one gear higher than needed.
Why did yo go to 355's ? So the 410's arent that bad at all?
10-03-2005, 02:01 PM
#6
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
RE: 390's .... VS ..... 410's
They are not great. Someone can correct me on this but I believe that from every gear ratio that you go up your RPM's will increase by 200. So ex: if you were cruising on the highway w/ 3:73's in 5th doing 80mph and at 2,400rpm's, with 4:10's you will be at 2,600. DO NOT take my word for it but Ive heard that a couple times before.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM
