5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Differences Among Harmonic Dampers/Balancers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2015, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Urambo Tauro
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Urambo Tauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 939
Default Differences Among Harmonic Dampers/Balancers

I'm preparing to replace my harmonic damper/balancer, but I see there are different kinds available. Most regular units are in the mid double-digit price range, but I see some "racing" ones that are significantly more expensive.

What is different about them? Are the cheaper ones less capable of doing their job? Is it a longevity issue? What is it that you're paying for in a high-end unit?
Urambo Tauro is offline  
Old 11-26-2015, 10:00 PM
  #2  
mongolchuck
2nd Gear Member
 
mongolchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 258
Default

Mostly in materials. Stock ones are rubber bonded to metal. Race ones have more durable urethane or all metal construction. Some of the more expensive ones have removable weights. What are your goals with the car? Stock will dampen vibration better but not stand up as well to constant high revs.
mongolchuck is offline  
Old 11-26-2015, 10:12 PM
  #3  
Urambo Tauro
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Urambo Tauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 939
Default

Hm. Sounds like a real one-or-the-other trade-off. For a daily driver, I would certainly choose vibration dampening over high-rev longevity. There doesn't seem to be anything to gain from putting a race unit in a street car. I will pursue an OEM-type replacement.

When we're talking about "high revs", are we talking about the stock redline area of ~5900ish RPM? Or are we referring to race engines that are built to exceed that?

Last edited by Urambo Tauro; 11-26-2015 at 10:16 PM.
Urambo Tauro is offline  
Old 11-26-2015, 11:59 PM
  #4  
mongolchuck
2nd Gear Member
 
mongolchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 258
Default

In response to your last question mostly the high rev race prep motors. It's not just the revs but the high heat those motors experience. Most foxes have been beat on at least a little and the stock balancers survived for 20 years. A stock style replacement will be fine for stock to mildly built engines.
mongolchuck is offline  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Boss_Hotrod
5th Gear Member
 
Boss_Hotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,166
Default

I think ford racing offers a stock style replacement for around $80. That will work fine for a DD car.
Boss_Hotrod is offline  
Old 12-01-2015, 11:17 AM
  #6  
Urambo Tauro
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Urambo Tauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 939
Default

I decided to get the Ford Racing M-6316-M50. Thanks for the information and suggestions, everyone!
Urambo Tauro is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikelieb1289
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
01-05-2016 11:56 AM
PSUSkier
2005-2014 Mustangs
9
12-10-2015 05:36 PM
rextos
General Tech
10
12-02-2015 10:06 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang Videos
0
11-23-2015 05:25 PM
AdamManTM
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
11-21-2015 08:53 PM



Quick Reply: Differences Among Harmonic Dampers/Balancers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.