vfast

why all the fighting who cares what cars weight care about what your own cars' weight....
Wheelbase : 100.5"
Length: 179.1" 1979-84
179.3" 1985-86
179.6" 1987-93

Width: 67.4" 1979-82
69.1" 1983-89
68.3" 1990-93

Track F/R : 57.9"/57.0"

Fuel Capacity : 12.25 gal. 1979
15.40 gal. 19832-93

Weight Distribution
Weight, Body Auto/Manual[Auto][Manual]
---- -------------------------------
Sedan,3097/3037 #[59.2/40.8] [59.3/40.7]
Hatchback, 3162/3102 #[58.0/42.0] [57.8/42.2]
Covertible, 3238/3298 #[57.8/42.2] [57.8/42.2]

Bore : 4.00"
Stroke : 3.00"
Bore Spacing : 4.380"
Main journal : 2.2486"
Rod journal : 2.1232"
Rod length: 5.09"
Intake valve : 1.782"
Exhaust valves : 1.45"
Firing Order : 15426378, 1979-81
13726548, 1982-93

Compresssion Ratio : 8.4:1 1979
8.3:1 1982-84
8.4:1 1985
8.4:1 1986
9.0:1 1987-93

Horsepower: 146 @ 3600 RPM 1979
157 @ 4200 RPM 1982
175 @ 4200 RPM 1983
165 @ 3800 RPM 1984CFI
175 @ 4200 RPM 1984Bbl
180 @ 4200 RPM 1985CFI
210 @ 4400 RPM 1985Bbl
200 @ 4000 RPM 1986
225 @ 4200 RPM 1987-92
205 @ 4200 RPM 1993

Torque, ft-lb : 250 @ 1800 RPM 1979
240 @ 2400 RPM 1982
245 @ 2400 RPM 1983
245 @ 2000 RPM 1984CFI
245 @ 2400 RPM 1984Bbl
260 @ 2600 RPM 1985CFI
270 @ 3200 RPM 1985Bbl
285 @ 3000 RPM 1986
300 @ 3200 RPM 1987-92
275 @ 3000 RPM 1993

Much of this information was referenced from the "1979-1993 Mustang V8 Specifications Guide" written by Al Kirschenbaum and published by DriveLines, 1993. This book contains much more information than is presented here and it is highly recommended.

T5superduty

</P>


LOL ok now you say all this other stuff, subwoofers, nitrous bottles,power seats etc. You completely contridicted yourself by saying your not dumb and almost completely miss spellingeverything on the way. I was basicly saying what a bone stock stang "weighed" in at. I just started this because I was talking to someone else on this forum about the weight of these cars and he thoughtbecause he added up some numbers in thedoor jam that his car "weighed" 4200 "lbs"</P>


<IMG src=smileys/smiley19.gif border="0"></P>

FiveOhNo

</P>


seriously...who the f*ck cares...i went back and gtech'd my car at 3100lbs...hit 209rwhp...still not bad for an almost stock 5.0L enough to take outtwo bad STI drivers and any other rice around here</P>


ps-i raced another STI a couple nights ago and got beat...that's why i say "bad STI drivers"</P>

vfast

I would say 209 is close

PeaceKeeper

I thought a stock 89' had 225 hp, and haveing those few upgrades FiveOhNo, why are you only hitting 209 rwhp?

T5superduty

They dont have 225 horsepower at the wheels. They only have about 180-190 at the wheels stock.