5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

11.3:1 compression ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2005, 12:51 PM
  #1  
351foxstang
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
351foxstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ma
Posts: 770
Default 11.3:1 compression ratio?

hi,
using the calculators on this page i found the compression ratio of the motor i am buying parts for to be 11.3:1. what does this mean in terms of driveability as both a summer driver and for strip use? also is this a good number or would there be a better ratio for this type of use?
carl
351foxstang is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:17 PM
  #2  
schwindty
4th Gear Member
 
schwindty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,668
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

IF you have a high compression engine as long as the cam is streetable, you have to driveability problems you just have to run high test fuel all the time. I am not sure of the longevity of them as well you are going to have to ask someone else that one..... But I do know that you have to run high test all the time
schwindty is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:27 PM
  #3  
StangTangGT
3rd Gear Member
 
StangTangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cocoa beach, FL
Posts: 853
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

which sucks if its not an all track racer
StangTangGT is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:46 PM
  #4  
351foxstang
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
351foxstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ma
Posts: 770
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

thanks for the fast responses. i pay alot a week for fuel for my truck anyways so i doubt i will notice much of a difference between the costs of high test and the 80-90$ i have to pay per week for that. id rather pay for expensive gas and have a car that will be good on the track.
thanks again,
carl
351foxstang is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:52 PM
  #5  
Derf00
Gentleman's Relish
 
Derf00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,090
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

also to note with that compression. You will NOT be able to run forced induction (i.e. SC or Turbo) with such a high compression. As long as you keep your motor NA, you'll be fine.
Derf00 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:08 PM
  #6  
351foxstang
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
351foxstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ma
Posts: 770
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

ok sounds good. ive got eagle forged rods, stock crank and keith black hypereutectic pistons. with that setup i wasnt planning on nitrous or any forced induction anyways.
carl
351foxstang is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 05:06 PM
  #7  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

Yea your compression is fine for a NA car.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:46 PM
  #8  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

I can't see how you can really tell what the compression is without knowing the EXACT measurments of everything.
What is the EXACT deck hieght? What is the EXACT stroke, not just what Ford says it is. What about the cc of the cylinder head, measured volume not what somebody says it is.
Start measuring things and you could get quite a surprise.
Unless you live someplace with at least a 5000' altitude, I don't think that an 11.3 compression engine is going to be the way to go no matter what sort of gas you can get........
tinman is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 12:42 AM
  #9  
351foxstang
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
351foxstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ma
Posts: 770
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?


ORIGINAL: tinman

I can't see how you can really tell what the compression is without knowing the EXACT measurments of everything.
What is the EXACT deck hieght? What is the EXACT stroke, not just what Ford says it is. What about the cc of the cylinder head, measured volume not what somebody says it is.
Start measuring things and you could get quite a surprise.
Unless you live someplace with at least a 5000' altitude, I don't think that an 11.3 compression engine is going to be the way to go no matter what sort of gas you can get........
your right, i only went by what ive seen in different manuals, etc. what do you suggest for a better set up?
thanks,
carl
351foxstang is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 06:14 PM
  #10  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: 11.3:1 compression ratio?

Where are You located? The altitude will make a lot of differance in what will run good.
Here in Arizona, I'm at 3000' static and lots of days are 5000+ air density so here you can run 10.5, no problem on pump gas premium.
Also consider the head gasket thickness. The common Fel-Pro blue is about .040 thick installed. There are gaskets out there that are anything from .021 all the way to .065 that I know of.
If you use an .021 it will raise compression over the Fel-Pro about .3 ratio. i.e.-- 10.0 to 10.3
What heads are planning to use?
Also, in Hot Rod magizine, July or August '05 there is a good artitle about pump gas high compression engines.....
tinman is offline  


Quick Reply: 11.3:1 compression ratio?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.