5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2005, 11:59 PM
  #1  
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 543
Default 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Hey. I plan on rebulding my engine in a couple of months and cant decide on whether to get a 331 or 347 kit. It will be a daily driver, and also I plan on putting a good cam in it when I rebuild it. What are the pros and cons of 347's and 331's. I dont want it to burn oil and I dont want it to get 10mpg. Do you get much more power out of a 347? Please let me know what you guys know.
95_302_StangMan is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:08 AM
  #2  
cammedlx
5th Gear Member
 
cammedlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Cacalaky
Posts: 2,055
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Most of the 347 oil problems have already been resolved...since its really the number that you like best since im sure there is only about a 15-20hp differnce between the two with similar setups...And if you're worried about gas mileage stick to a stock rebuild honestly...
cammedlx is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:11 AM
  #3  
stanglx2002
6th Gear Member
 
stanglx2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 5,205
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

i have a 331 as a DD and i get about 17 mpg
stanglx2002 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:11 AM
  #4  
90Mustangfan
I ♥ Acer
 
90Mustangfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,259
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

I'd go with the 331 it will be more reliable and last longer. And yes you will get worse gas mileage, probally around 10-15mpg or so dependging on how you drive...with a 331 stroker, I doubt you will drive slow. they fixed the problem with the 347 burning oil on the newer kits, some have it fixed some dont. and the lifespan of a 347 is quiet a bit lower also...power will definitly more with the 347, IDK what you can get with a 347 probally around 400-500 with a good H/C/I combo, but if you just do the stroker on stock heads and intake, you will probally see little to no gain
90Mustangfan is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:36 AM
  #5  
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 543
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

I plan on getting new intake and heads/headers after I build the engine, also I am not doing a stock rebuild that I have ruled out. Gas milage is not that important. What would the average life span of a 347 all forged internals life span be vs all forged internals 331 lifespan? Also did you say that 331 will be worse milage than the 347 or did you mean than stock? Thanks for the info so far.
95_302_StangMan is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:34 AM
  #6  
StangTangGT
3rd Gear Member
 
StangTangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cocoa beach, FL
Posts: 853
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Ive heard the difference is even less than 15 horsepower but i guess that could all depend on different setups. I'd say it just means the 331 will be closer to the life of a 302 than the 347 would. Theres gonna be more movement in the cylinders so premature wear of certain parts is expected.
StangTangGT is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:38 AM
  #7  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Im pretty sure that a 347 will need refreshening around 25-30k compared to a 331 where you can take it to 90k (dont quote me, just what Ive heard) and the power difference is not that much. You will make a little but more horsepower with the 347 but there is a notible torque difference between the two (more w/ the 347) but IMO since its a daily driver I would DEF go with a 331. You should look into CHP (coasthigh.com) or some reputable company like that.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 10:12 AM
  #8  
HC_CrAzYHoRsE
Super Moderator
 
HC_CrAzYHoRsE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

why not do a 306 with an SC ? it would make more power and be more reliable then both, that's what i plan on doing.
HC_CrAzYHoRsE is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 11:55 AM
  #9  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

Yea thats true. But NA is sick. I would go with a 331, even if it made less power.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:23 PM
  #10  
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 543
Default RE: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker

25-30k??? BS I dont belive you.
95_302_StangMan is offline  


Quick Reply: 347 stroker vs 331 stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.