5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

4.6 vs. 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2006, 03:42 PM
  #21  
hatingyou
2nd Gear Member
 
hatingyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 196
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

The 5.0 went up till 1995. After that ford switched to the 4.6 motors from 96-98. After that they kept the 4.6 but went with the PI setup, which was basically better heads, intake, and a few other things I think. (not positive on what all the PI cars, 99+, added)
hatingyou is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 06:46 PM
  #22  
Mustang95
3rd Gear Member
 
Mustang95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 513
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

Around a half second slower.....



Car-Stats.com Report for 1994 Ford Mustang GT (conv)
Obtained from MT January, 1994
0-60: 6.9 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 15.7
1/4 Speed: 88


Mustang95 is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:49 PM
  #23  
92TitaniumGT
1st Gear Member
 
92TitaniumGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 73
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

my 92 fox 5.0 has 213k miles on the original motor with no internal work done.....runs like a dream....and I take it to the track often! I mean you cant argue with that.....
92TitaniumGT is offline  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:54 PM
  #24  
91stang
4th Gear Member
 
91stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

personaly... i wouldn't trust a pre-modded car. especially a mustang. for all you know the last owner could have tried to mod it and didn't know what he/she was doing and screwed it up or did crazy **** in it and messed something up.
91stang is offline  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:07 PM
  #25  
Mustang95
3rd Gear Member
 
Mustang95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 513
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

Yeh thats true , there a guy near me who used to be fords head mechanic, and i called them up and thats the reason why they won't work on 5.0's to many of them have work done, witout new owners knowing what is done to them..
Mustang95 is offline  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:25 PM
  #26  
4eyedfreak
3rd Gear Member
 
4eyedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 693
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

You said your parents bought you one for christmas you rich bastard!
ORIGINAL: blk95snake

I just bought the 95 cobra I have now and I've owned a 98gt as well as an 88gt. Having owned all three I would say that the differences really don't matter because you're going to have to put plenty of mods on whatever you go with to keep up with the newer stangs out...99 and up. Stock I would say that the fox body and SN 95 where about the same for speed, but the weight of my cobra seems to slow it down more. I about to start modding the cobra which is sock now and I'll have to see how it responds compared to the fox and 4.6.
4eyedfreak is offline  
Old 01-10-2006, 09:57 PM
  #27  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

SN-95's were somewhat heavier.
Think of it like you would a girlfriend. Would you rather have a heavy one or not. The lighter one will usually perform better. same with cars.....
tinman is offline  
Old 01-10-2006, 10:38 PM
  #28  
92hatchLX
6th Gear Member
 
92hatchLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,439
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

There's something screwy with those 0-60 times. Now the last time that I checked the general reference is about every 100lb removed or added is .1 (a tenth) of a second, I didn't know that my car weighed 1000 lbs more than a coupe. Just checked my tag on the inside of my door and it says that the GVRW is 4240. I'd like to know what the GVRW of a hatchback is, but I'd really like to know.
92hatchLX is offline  
Old 01-10-2006, 10:51 PM
  #29  
Mustang95
3rd Gear Member
 
Mustang95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 513
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

The only other thing different with sn95 5.0 and 93 down is, sn95 have 10 more horse and 10 more tor.
Mustang95 is offline  
Old 01-11-2006, 11:33 PM
  #30  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: 4.6 vs. 5.0

The whole idea about the 'remove 100# and it's .10 quicker' applies to 1/4 mile E.T. only and then the 100# has to come from the right places.....
tinman is offline  


Quick Reply: 4.6 vs. 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.