HC_CrAzYHoRsE

well that's one way to see it, personnaly i think the fox looks badass and mean, the Sn-95 looks like a girlier car (not in a bad way). to each his own i guess.

5.0 MPG

Wait a minute..............your in a Mustang 5.0 forum and your bashing Fox Bodies, you've got a picture of a rice burner.....and your wet behind the ears with 10 post??? What are you a pain freak? Take those comments to the Honda Forum or whatever it is your driving there...........

blk95snake

You should decide whether you want a smoother ride or a meaner looking car. In my opinion the fox looks meaner, but the my 95 cobra is sooooo much smoother riding than the 88gt I used to own. As far as horsepower goes....neither one is very fast stock...but that's why there's an aftermarket. Choose which body style you think looks better and you can't go wrong, both are awesome cars.

marx91

whats bad about the '93 cobras is the computer, it retards the timing to much
to get the power that it really has, if i had one i would put an A9L in it
then it would run like a raped ape, but those cars are hard to come by
so like the rest of the majority on this thread your better off looking
for a '95 cobra as they are not collectors items like the '93

5.0coupe

u can find some 93 cobras i saw one it was a 93 TT cobra ........badass let me tell u but yes a 5.0 cobra is the way to go way more rare also

92TitaniumGT

A sn95 cobra is def much easier to find....the 96-98 is a nice car and it is rated at 305 HP...but a friend of mine has a 96 with pretty much the same basic stuff i have (gears, cold air, etc) and it barely pulls on my gt fox... the 94-95 5.0 cobra would be much easier and cheaper to mod....and the 93 cobra well...good luck finding one for less than 15k...sn 95's ive seen for 6k+....oh yea I cant believe he pulled out the "box on wheels" thing....if it was so bad looking why has no other body style sold as much?