5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Fastest year?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2004, 02:50 AM
  #11  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default Fastest year?



I dont see how a bullit would pull those times. The only major difference unless I am forgetting something was dual throttle bodys and a few tweaks on the suspension. Engine wise etc I dont think there is a diff.</P>


I HAVE heard that the bullit setup (twin TBs) is good for a bunch more power in supercharged applications compared to a GT. This came from dyno numbers in MM+FF, they put a bullit intake on a GT</P>
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:01 AM
  #12  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Fastest year?

Originally Posted by 2000GT4.6


I dont see how a bullit would pull those times. The only major difference unless I am forgetting something was dual throttle bodys and a few tweaks on the suspension. Engine wise etc I dont think there is a diff.
</P>


exactly, the only way a gt or bullit would go that fast stock would most likely be because it was donewith slicks.</P>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 07:48 PM
  #13  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default Fastest year?

if you dont believe me go look it up. 99 cobras are weak as hell.
Quik is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 08:59 PM
  #14  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default Fastest year?



Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
if you dont believe me go look it up. 99 cobras are weak as hell.
</P>


lol come on now... there not weak... when you see stats on cars you cant always believe magazines and stuff. Sometimes when they are tested they dont have traction, the conditions were bad, etc. Same with some tests done in the 60's. Most of it was because the tire technology was not that great and those big torque muscle cars couldnt hook up.</P>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 09:02 PM
  #15  
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
mkspeed26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,392
Default Fastest year?



Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
if you dont believe me go look it up. 99 cobras are weak as hell.
</P>


weak as hell?? relative to what?? that would kick the sh*t out of 95% of the cars on the road today <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0"></P>
mkspeed26 is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 01:56 AM
  #16  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default Fastest year?

the 99 cobras get eaten badly by GTs and hell a GT is weak
Quik is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 08:31 PM
  #17  
ZoomZoom04
1st Gear Member
 
ZoomZoom04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 53
Default Fastest year?

my uncle has a 99 kenny bell cobra and he raced my neighbor with a stock 01 gt and the cobra burned it so i dont know what ur talkin about??
ZoomZoom04 is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 10:20 PM
  #18  
87GT+70mach1
1st Gear Member
 
87GT+70mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 62
Default Fastest year?

you are an idiot. cobras are not weak as hell. they have about 70 more hp than a gt- how could they be equal?..... the only weak cobras are the 96-98
87GT+70mach1 is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 04:10 AM
  #19  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default Fastest year?

you are full of s**t ********. do you remember the recalls. you guys are all young and probably dont remeber. the 99 motors had issues. why you think that they didnt make a production cobra in 00. it was to fix the problems of the cobra. GO LOOK INTO THE ARTICLES THEN COME BACK


and a blown cobra is a different story.
Quik is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 04:14 AM
  #20  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default Fastest year?

Originally Posted by 87GT+70mach1
you are an idiot. cobras are not weak as hell. they have about 70 more hp than a gt- how could they be equal?..... the only weak cobras are the 96-98
first off you got alot of f***ing nerve calling a f***ing name. dont you know s**t about a stang. one the 94-95 cobras are the slower ones out of the sn95 bodys. the 96-98 had 305hp. the 99 cobra 'CLAIMED' to have 320 but actually had less then the GTs because to their bad design in the heads and intake.
Quik is offline  


Quick Reply: Fastest year?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.