5.0 LX/GT
02-01-2004, 04:37 AM
#11
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
5.0 LX/GT
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
02-06-2004, 02:30 AM
#13
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
02-06-2004, 04:38 AM
#14
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </p>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
02-06-2004, 05:49 AM
#15
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 86
5.0 LX/GT
1982 Ford Mustang GT 8.0 N/A
1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.9 15.8
1985 Ford Mustang GT 7.2 15.9
1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.7 15.3
1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.4 14.9
1991 Ford Mustang GT 7.3 15.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.2 14.8
1993 Ford Mustang Cobra 5.9 14.5
1993 Ford Mustang GT(auto) 8.0 16.1
1994 Ford Mustang Cobra 6.9 15.3
1994 Ford Mustang GT 6.7 15.1
1995 Ford Mustang 3.8 9.9 17.3
</P>
There now shut up about the times already.</P>
02-06-2004, 02:51 PM
#16
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
SHOW ME BITCH...The reason why the heads were redesigned was because they didn't take well to modifications......Show me a link were a completely stock 1987 and up GT rana f***ing 14.4...the 93 cobra didn't even post times like that...and for your information...I'm a very good f***ing driver...and i bet my stang would whip up on your *** any day of the week...</P>
02-06-2004, 02:54 PM
#17
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</P>
02-06-2004, 03:59 PM
#18
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </p>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</p>
and for your knowledge a 93 cobra went 13.75 @ 98.27mph shifting at 5500 and trap was made in third gear.
and again all facts come from The Offical FORD MUSTANG 5.0 technical reference & performance handbook
02-06-2004, 04:02 PM
#19
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </p>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
SHOW ME BITCH...The reason why the heads were redesigned was because they didn't take well to modifications......Show me a link were a completely stock 1987 and up GT ran a f***ing 14.4...the 93 cobra didn't even post times like that...and for your information...I'm a very good f***ing driver...and i bet my stang would whip up on your *** any day of the week...</p>
02-06-2004, 04:09 PM
#20
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
5.0 LX/GT
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
Originally Posted by 00banditv8
Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
no the GT isnt more powerful, they both have the same hp. the LX is lighter and also have the same handling package as the GT. the stangs have problems with their trannys. both AOD and T5 are weak production ones. your looking at low 14s stock if you can drive with either ride.[as long as its in good shape] the SD cars are faster compare to a MAF car stock. since the stock MAF have very restrictive inlets. depending on the options are the variations of gears it had. expect anything from 273 up to 355. notchbacks are lighter but its going to be hard to find a good 5.0 notchback. alot of ppl are converting a 4banger into a 5.0. yes they are reliable if taken care of like any car. if you beat it then youll have issues with it. gas mileage should be around 14-25mph depending on the car and the driver. power wise 87-92 have 225 hp and 300 tq. and the 93 are underrated at 205hp. 92 started the first year for basecoat/clearcoat paint and also first year for the colormatched moldings. 91 introduced the pony wheel and larger front wheel openings. 90 had airbags, 86-88 had SD. some 88 had MAF they were the CAliforna cars. also 89 started the 140 speedo option.
low 14's in a 302 GT....not even close...with mods yeah but not stock...the 1986 GT was faster than the 1987 and newer GT's 1987-1993 GT's run high 14's low 15's. </P>
facts
1986 mustang gt weighing in 3140lbs, 5 speed, 273 gearwitht a best of 14.64 @ 92mph
87 mustang gt weighing in 3160lbs 5 speed 273 gear wenta a best of 14.40 @ 96mph
90 mustang gt 5speed 308 gears went 14.26 @ 96.58mph
these are bone stock figures[which dont matter really anymore]
resource = The offical FORD Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & performance handbook
and if the 86 style motors where the strongest then how come they redesigned the heads and TB?
Your just another young p**** with an attitude....Know your f***ing mustang history before you try and come on here with that s**t...14.4 hell you would have to blow that bitch up to achieve those kind of times and you still wouldn't be able to do it.</P>
and for your knowledge a 93 cobra went 13.75 @ 98.27mph shifting at 5500 and trap was made in third gear.
and again all facts come from The Offical FORD MUSTANG 5.0 technical reference & performance handbook
Your such an idiot. If the f***ing cobra ran a 13.7...why wasn't it able to beat the LT1 Camaro....Your such a dumb f***...No one one here gonna believe that s**t..I'm about to post the race for your dumb ***...Fine someone else to argue with..because you picked the wrong mustang man to argue with..I know my history....learn yours...dumb ***.</P>