5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

How bad are stock Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2006, 03:52 PM
  #1  
Low_5.0
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Low_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 248
Default How bad are stock Heads

Ok...ive been reading so many post that say the stock heads on the 5.0 are HOrrible....how bad are they?.....would this be something that i should upgrade first instead of a Cam??
Low_5.0 is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 03:58 PM
  #2  
cammedlx
5th Gear Member
 
cammedlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Cacalaky
Posts: 2,055
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

Yes because i don't care what anybody says...a aftermarket cam with stock heads are worthless...And they are pretty terrible ecspecailly on the exhaust side..
cammedlx is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 04:02 PM
  #3  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

think about it this way put ur hands around ur neck and squeeze thats what stock heads do to a mustang. and like someone else said putting a cam in a pretty much stock mustang isn't going to do very much except for sound. i would put my money esle where
w8less is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 04:47 PM
  #4  
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
r.barn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

Here's a good way to look at it

Stock 5.0 .... axp. 225 hp

Ford sells crate engine listed at ........ 345hp

basically same engine with just high flow heads and
more aggressive cam, intake and throttle body.


The stock heads and intake and small throttle body
are horrible breathers.
Stocker headers not much better either.


You can get good gains from better cylind heads.
but you need to upgrade the the intake manifold and throttle body with it.
r.barn is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 06:05 PM
  #5  
FakeSaleen
 
FakeSaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 8
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

actually the 5.0 cam is great that should be last and you will see the biggest hp gains from replacing the heads, they are
very restrictive and you wont see the gains from your other upgrades until the heads are changed.
FakeSaleen is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 06:08 PM
  #6  
horatio102
4th Gear Member
 
horatio102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: B'ham, WA
Posts: 1,484
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

car craft put AFR 165 heads with 1.7 rockers with the stock cam on a carb'd 5.0, stock bottom end, and picked up 100hp.
horatio102 is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 06:29 PM
  #7  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: How bad are stock Heads

^^ I believe that. AFR's are the sh*t man! Get some used 165's.
88BlueGT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
09-02-2015 04:12 PM
iculookin
GT S197 General Discussion
0
09-02-2015 12:34 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-01-2015 08:16 PM
kawiguy827
5.0L GT S550 Tech
0
09-01-2015 07:09 PM



Quick Reply: How bad are stock Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.