5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2006, 10:42 PM
  #1  
moparman1975
Thread Starter
 
moparman1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Default 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Yes, I know everyone is going to vote 2.5" but here's the details.

My 84 GT is going to have a stock 88 5.0, shorty headers, H-pipe, and a flowmaster cat-back.

I found a 2.25" FM cat-back with stainless tips and 40 series muffs for under $190, the same setup in 2.5" jacks the price up to $300-$320. Will the sound be similar to the 2.5"? The 2.25" should be more than enough for a stock to mild 5.0. Right? If I spend the extra $100 will I see a noticable difference besides a lighter wallet?

moparman1975 is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:45 PM
  #2  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Yes, if you're not going wild for power it will be fine.
PRO50SC is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:50 PM
  #3  
95ConvGT
1st Gear Member
 
95ConvGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 133
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Well it depends if you stick with what you have then a 2.25 will be fine but if you plan on going forced induction then you need to step up to a larger one.
95ConvGT is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:04 PM
  #4  
stanglx2002
6th Gear Member
 
stanglx2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 5,205
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

the 2.25 pipes was a way for ford to restrict the cars some more. the 2.5 pipes are used to increase exhaust flow to gain more hp
stanglx2002 is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:10 PM
  #5  
ZachW04Stang
5th Gear Member
 
ZachW04Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 4,343
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Summit racing has flowmaster american thunder exhaust for $240. I think it would be worth spend $50 more instead of getting a cheap cat back. Just remember you get what you pay for.
ZachW04Stang is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:25 PM
  #6  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

2.25 restricted? no way I mean come on people back in the 60's Mustangs, falcons, Galaxies. so on but they only used 2 inch exhaust and still made major hp, some cars were only single 2 inch and made 425 hp. you will never notice the difference in performance from 2.25 and 2.5
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 02-19-2006, 11:32 PM
  #7  
stanglx2002
6th Gear Member
 
stanglx2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 5,205
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???


ORIGINAL: Tims 88GT

2.25 restricted? no way I mean come on people back in the 60's Mustangs, falcons, Galaxies. so on but they only used 2 inch exhaust and still made major hp, some cars were only single 2 inch and made 425 hp. you will never notice the difference in performance from 2.25 and 2.5
bs you need to do some more research and learn some more. take one of your 60's mustangs making 400 hp and put a 2 inch exhaust to a dyno and then take the same car and put a 2.5 in exhaust on it and see if it doesnt make more power. Im sry but you are wrong I had a 2.25 inch exhaust with cats my 331 and then put my 2.5 inch exhaust when it came in the mail and i gained about 20-30 hp
stanglx2002 is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 10:23 AM
  #8  
SAKONNA
1st Gear Member
 
SAKONNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 64
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

Bigger isnt always better, man that sounded korny. but anyway, the 2.25 system will sound a bit better than the 2.50 system. the smaller the pipes, the snappier the sound. If he isnt looking to exceed 300hp the 2.25 is fine and you'll gain a little torque. Plus, you'll get out of that annoying buzzing coming from under the car because the exhaust is hitting the frame lol. Ultimately, it's up to you. the 2.25 system with a O/R pipe and flows sounds good!!! Just make sure your entire system is 2.25....if you're off road pipe is 2.50 and you want to add a 2.25 system, you're creating a bottle neck....and that's just Dumb lol 2.25 off road are so hard to find these days....everything is 2.50. Now, I am not knocking the 2.50 system, cause that wayy good too, but it's just my 2cents
SAKONNA is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 11:34 AM
  #9  
nitrous_bob
6th Gear Member
 
nitrous_bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: st clair shores MI
Posts: 6,028
Default RE: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???

if you at least get better the headers, the 2 1/4" won't be so bad. the headers are the big restriction w/ all the pinch points.

but i do think it will run better on the 2 1/2" w/ stock motor even.

my old notch went 13.60's on 4.10's w/ et streets (bone stock), the next spring by doing just the exhaust , it went 13.20's. i used long tube mac's , flowmaster american thunder 2 1/2" catback.

now, thats not saying i didn't improve my driving style some...but that was a big difference imo.



nitrous_bob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hurricanedt77
Parts For Sale
9
10-22-2006 01:47 PM
LesteR723
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
05-15-2006 02:35 PM
bmob
Parts For Sale
0
04-21-2006 05:02 PM
blk95snake
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
12
03-23-2006 03:32 PM



Quick Reply: 2.25" exhaust vs. 2.5"???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.