5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

question for buddy..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2006, 07:37 AM
  #1  
92maro
Thread Starter
 
92maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Default question for buddy..

a buddy of mine has a 1991 mustang GT. It is a convertable, with auto transmition. The guy he purchased it from installed a vortech v-1 s/c, flowmaster, single chamber exhaust, 3.73 gears, k&n filter. just got new pirelle tires(275/35-17). anyways, we took it to the track the other night here in el paso tx. nearest i could figure our density altitude was around 5800. Ok, so he took maybe 4-5 runs. First run was the worst with a time of 15.7... i told him to let some aire out the tires, and he got the best run of the night which was a 15.2?? i was just wondeing if these numbers seem right. i know he was hoping to run a 13. we dont have the best track in the world so i was wondering if any of you could tell me about what it would run if he ran it at a well preped track, with good conditions. Also, if you could give me a number on what he might/should dyno.
92maro is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 09:13 AM
  #2  
HC_CrAzYHoRsE
Super Moderator
 
HC_CrAzYHoRsE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
Default RE: question for buddy..

those time would suck even if he was stock, and you're saying he's supercharged ????[&:]
HC_CrAzYHoRsE is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 09:18 AM
  #3  
92maro
Thread Starter
 
92maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Default RE: question for buddy..

i know for a fact he is S/C/ but i do know our track runs alittle slower than most.... usually about a half second slower than most other tracks. plus with the density altitude that high, i figure at sea level it would probably knock of about .3-.4 seconds.
92maro is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 09:33 AM
  #4  
HC_CrAzYHoRsE
Super Moderator
 
HC_CrAzYHoRsE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
Default RE: question for buddy..

well he does have the heaviest and slowest fox of them all... GT+vert+auto = bad combo, but with an S/C, gears and good tires he should still easily see 13s. i'd have to guess something is wrong with his set-up, regardless of the track.
HC_CrAzYHoRsE is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 09:49 AM
  #5  
92maro
Thread Starter
 
92maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Default RE: question for buddy..

i was thinking that something was wrong with it. although i havent been able to put my finger on it.... he thought it could be anything from crappy A/F ratio, to compression problems, to valve float. he isint in town much so he doesnt have to much time to work on her. I dont know exactly what he should be running, but 15.2 seemed extremely high to me. it runs well, up until recently when he was replacing the TB gasket and accidentaly left a peice of the old gasket on there, so when he started it up he got radiator fluid into the intake manifold. this was way after the horrible track times though. So he should be running 13s with this setup?
92maro is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 02:11 PM
  #6  
Mustang95
3rd Gear Member
 
Mustang95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 513
Default RE: question for buddy..

well u got to figure minus a second for auto, a second for convetible, but adding a second with a supercharger, i think hed run mid to high 14's......
Mustang95 is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 02:14 PM
  #7  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: question for buddy..

^^ I dont care if you have a 93 auto convertible. With a decent blower setup you will hit 13's. I could be wrong but I dont see how its possible to run high 14's with a supercharged 5.0.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 06:15 PM
  #8  
92maro
Thread Starter
 
92maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Default RE: question for buddy..

i did think these times sucked, he raced a stock 1992 stang aod hatch. he only beat the stock stang by .4 seconds... i know that there is something wrong with his stang, just dont know what it could be.
92maro is offline  
Old 02-27-2006, 06:19 PM
  #9  
lookinforastang
I ♥ Acer
 
lookinforastang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,039
Default RE: question for buddy..

that is absolutely horrible

give me that setup and i bet i could run high 12's with slicks
lookinforastang is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 12:02 AM
  #10  
gspfunk
5th Gear Member
 
gspfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,834
Default RE: question for buddy..

Take it to a respectable tuner and get it done right. Those times are wayyyy off for the combo he has!!!
gspfunk is offline  


Quick Reply: question for buddy..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.