5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

the start of the 5.0 craze

Old 01-20-2014, 05:58 PM
  #1  
DCzapla
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DCzapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 149
Default the start of the 5.0 craze

Having graduated high school in 1995, i was well immersed in the fox 5.0 hysteria. But it wasnt until later i realised that the 82 GT was the vehicle that really sparked the interest. Even for me as a young kid at 6 years old a neighbor bought a new 1982 Mustang GT in silver metallic...how i remember that i dont know. I remember it didnt sound like any other car i was aware of. With its good looks it was then ( little did i know at the time) i fell in love with Mustangs. Yet even today I wonder why you dont really hear anyone mention the humble 82 GT seems its forgotten everyone loves the 87-93 fox body ponies. Its a shame i think the 82 GT is a very significant milestone in the 50 yr history of the Mustang. Tell me what you think
DCzapla is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 06:10 PM
  #2  
Csrt4to5.0gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Csrt4to5.0gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 352
Default

Wasn't that when the V8 was available with either a 4.2L or upgraded 5.0? And the 6 was a 2.8L? I know that's right when ford "started" to bring the performance back into the mustang. I wouldn't mind having one.
Csrt4to5.0gt is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 07:02 PM
  #3  
DCzapla
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DCzapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Csrt4to5.0gt
Wasn't that when the V8 was available with either a 4.2L or upgraded 5.0? And the 6 was a 2.8L? I know that's right when ford "started" to bring the performance back into the mustang. I wouldn't mind having one.
The 4.2 was an experiment in 81. For 82 they returned the 302, or 5.0 not that itvwas absntvfor long but even in the mustang 2 it was a weak offering at best. Whats significant about 82 is the fact that it was the first Mustang in about a decade that had delivered on performance. It really got the public excited about Mustangs and American performance in general.
DCzapla is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 07:27 PM
  #4  
Csrt4to5.0gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Csrt4to5.0gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 352
Default

I was close on the year of the 4.2 but I knew that was the beginning of bringing the performance back to the stang. If you haven't done so already, I'd recommend getting the hardcover book, Mustang: Fifty Years. It's the newest publishing celebrating 50 years of the mustang right up to, and including, the 2014's.
Csrt4to5.0gt is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 06:55 AM
  #5  
DCzapla
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DCzapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 149
Default

Already got the book. Its a great book to sit down with on a long snowy winter day.
DCzapla is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 06:58 AM
  #6  
DCzapla
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DCzapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 149
Default

Ya know i wonded how an 82 GT with its 157 hp 302 would compare to a 65 GT with a K code 65 GT, as far as performance
DCzapla is offline  
Old 01-27-2014, 02:43 AM
  #7  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

Just mho but the new horsepower race started among the big 3 automakers about 1982.
There was a lot of pent up demand in this country for some sort of a new muscle then.
Just the old supply/demand deal working itself out.
fortunately for most of the people on this board the horsepower race hasn't stopped since........
tinman is offline  
Old 01-27-2014, 11:58 AM
  #8  
wydopnthrtl
2nd Gear Member
 
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 166
Default

I'm a gen Xer and remember the 82 coming out. It was a healthy dose of performance that ford was lacking in those days. But it also wasn't really a hot car. Z28s had a completely different / new look and is what most H.S. guys wanted. I was different than most in that I liked the mustangs. I like GM cars.. but a V8 mustang w/T-tops and a stick just made me drool back then.

87-93s ruled the stop lights and was obtainable for most young guys. GNs & Vettes were just not a teen or 20s car because of their costs, Z28s/TAs were around but most young guys couldn't afford the 350 or 305TPI versions until they were used or handed down. (ins cost was a big part of it)

If I could go to a ford dealership today and buy a..... 82 exterior w/T-Tops, 85 interior, w/2014 drivetrain? I would sell everything except my children and wife.

Last edited by wydopnthrtl; 01-27-2014 at 12:03 PM.
wydopnthrtl is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 04:53 AM
  #9  
DCzapla
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DCzapla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 149
Default

Like I said to start this thread, the 82 GT really caught my attention when i was a young kid and i have loved mustangs ever since. In my early teens a new family moved in across the street. Their teenage son had a 78 king cobra which he modified with an aftermarket cast aluminium intake and a 4 bbl carb ....Damn did that car sound sweet i can still hear him banging the gears down the back roads.
DCzapla is offline  
Old 01-31-2014, 11:06 PM
  #10  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

I was in high school during the time that the early generation of muscle cars were on the streets/strips everywhere.
The early Mustang did NOT have a great reputation in those days as most any GTO or BB Chevelle would out run it.......
tinman is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: the start of the 5.0 craze



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.