What do you think of this cam spec?
228/236 .544/.568 w/1.6 rocker 110... its ment to rev up to 6500rpm.. sounds good. but just want to get some opinions.. thanks my peeps lol
|
that sounds pretty good, how much are you spending on it?
i got a custom one made from chet herbert cams for $238 shipped |
300 its technicly a custom cam...
|
it definitely sounds like a good spec. should sound pretty nasty too
i've been too busy to get a vid of my 83 since i threw in my new cam, but i do scare people at the lights haha |
Originally Posted by gearbanger
(Post 5688521)
228/236 .544/.568 w/1.6 rocker 110... its ment to rev up to 6500rpm.. sounds good. but just want to get some opinions.. thanks my peeps lol
|
Those numbers are useless to a degree, how aggressive is it at .200-.300-.400, thats what you need to know
|
Originally Posted by woodsy
(Post 5689019)
Those numbers are useless to a degree, how aggressive is it at .200-.300-.400, thats what you need to know
|
Originally Posted by Portmaster
(Post 5689100)
The 228/236 @.50 and the lift of 544/568 and 110 lobe seperation tells you how agressive the cam will be. Duration tell you how long the valves will stay open and lift tells you how far they will open, the lobe seperation tells you how close the two event will happen to each other. Unless they started putting a detour on cam ramp profiles it pretty much explains itself, lol
|
Originally Posted by woodsy
(Post 5689110)
If you think so, those number dont even begin to tell you how aggressive the cam is.
|
Originally Posted by Portmaster
(Post 5689364)
If it's a Hyd roller you can bet it's pretty close with ramp angle. You seem to disagree with me. I'd sure like to hear your explination. I'm always open to furthering my education on cam dynamics
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands