When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A motor that is optimal at 9:0:1 compression with iron heads would be optimal at 9:5:1 (or so) with aluminum heads.
you are gonna have to explain that one, that makes no sense. why wouldnt an iron head be optimal at 9.5:1? so you're saying with my iron heads with 52cc chambers with approx 10-10.5:1 compression i wont gain anything out of it cause its not within your specified optimal range??
I bought a set of 190cc procomp heads about a year ago and never ran them. The biggest difference is the exhaust port. the exhaust ports look like they are twice the size of the stock ford heads. Honestly, i don't know if a 1-5/8s header flange will fit them. It would take a motor that needs a lot of exhaust flow to make good power with them. I wouldn't try them on a 302. 302s just don't need that much flow. If they were going on a 347, they would do better than the gt-40s.
I bought a set of 190cc procomp heads about a year ago and never ran them. The biggest difference is the exhaust port. the exhaust ports look like they are twice the size of the stock ford heads. Honestly, i don't know if a 1-5/8s header flange will fit them. It would take a motor that needs a lot of exhaust flow to make good power with them. I wouldn't try them on a 302. 302s just don't need that much flow. If they were going on a 347, they would do better than the gt-40s.
yea because you aren't allowed to port your heads or anything