5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

5.0 Explorers only rated at 215HP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2009, 10:01 PM
  #1  
94Blk5.0
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
94Blk5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,112
Default 5.0 Explorers only rated at 215HP?

I was looking up specs on the 5.0 Explorers, and found it odd that they are only rated at 215HP. Do they really make that much in their state of tune in the Explorers, or do they make similar numbers to the 5.0 Cobra?
94Blk5.0 is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:09 PM
  #2  
Milton
3rd Gear Member
 
Milton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ontario
Posts: 720
Default

i would imagine theyd have a different cam, something ment more for towing but thats just a guess
Milton is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:32 PM
  #3  
Mike 83 GLX
2nd Gear Member
 
Mike 83 GLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brownstown, MI
Posts: 219
Default

Also, the exhaust manifolds are nasty and choke it down really bad. Aftermarket Explorer headers are expensive, but make a huge difference.

The rest of the stock exhaust system is pretty small too.

Go here for any Explorer info you need:
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/index.php

Last edited by Mike 83 GLX; 01-28-2009 at 10:36 PM.
Mike 83 GLX is offline  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:33 PM
  #4  
86 5.0L
6th Gear Member
 
86 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,882
Default

the have a cam spec for low end torque not high end HP
86 5.0L is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:37 AM
  #5  
94Blk5.0
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
94Blk5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,112
Default

With the GT-40P heads, intake I figured they would have made more than 215. My buddy has a 5.0/Auto/AWD/3.73's and it feels strong, but they aren't even rated at 300 Ft/Lbs. Just wondering if they were underrated...

Thanks for link, Mike.
94Blk5.0 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 02:40 AM
  #6  
86 5.0L
6th Gear Member
 
86 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,882
Default

Originally Posted by 94Blk5.0
With the GT-40P heads, intake I figured they would have made more than 215. My buddy has a 5.0/Auto/AWD/3.73's and it feels strong, but they aren't even rated at 300 Ft/Lbs. Just wondering if they were underrated...

Thanks for link, Mike.
again its all about LOW end torque, doesnt matter how much just where
86 5.0L is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:44 AM
  #7  
94Blk5.0
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
94Blk5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,112
Default

Again, just wondering if they were underrated. Thats all.
94Blk5.0 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:28 AM
  #8  
USMC1775
4th Gear Member
 
USMC1775's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The P.R.K.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Our SN95s were rated the same
USMC1775 is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:33 AM
  #9  
FORD TOUGH
4th Gear Member
 
FORD TOUGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,107
Default

Originally Posted by 94Blk5.0
Again, just wondering if they were underrated. Thats all.
I have always wondered that too. i know they had a different cam,exhaust, and tune. Some I have rode in though realy don't seem to have much power.
FORD TOUGH is offline  
Old 01-29-2009, 09:35 AM
  #10  
FORD TOUGH
4th Gear Member
 
FORD TOUGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,107
Default

Originally Posted by USMC1775
Our SN95s were rated the same
I beleive the crown vic's in the late 80's and the the f150s were rated 215 also. How could they be the same as a mustang with better exhaust and cam.
FORD TOUGH is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 Explorers only rated at 215HP?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.