5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Stock intake question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2009, 12:48 PM
  #1  
Tony71502
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tony71502's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,459
Default Stock intake question

What is the bore on the stock throttle body, egr spacer, and upper intake plenum? 63mm? 65mm?

If I removed the EGR spacer where's a good location to re-attach the throttle cable bracket?
Tony71502 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 12:51 PM
  #2  
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
luckythirteen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: las vegas, nv
Posts: 9,092
Default

i believe its 60mm. and there is no hp benefit to removing the egr spacer so you might as well just leave it
luckythirteen13 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:03 PM
  #3  
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
w8less's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
Default

i thought it was 58mm on the foxes and 60m on the sn cars
w8less is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:17 PM
  #4  
FivePointOhh
in limbo
 
FivePointOhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,300
Default

pretty sure its 55mm on stock foxes. maybe thats the maf. i dunno.

leave the EGR and block off the holes.
FivePointOhh is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:36 PM
  #5  
dv3
3rd Gear Member
 
dv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: denver
Posts: 661
Default

lol..so its either 55, 58, 60, 63, or 65mm
sorry i have no real input
dv3 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:39 PM
  #6  
Tony71502
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tony71502's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,459
Default

I know it won't benefit me performance wise... but it's an eye sore. No coolant lines or EGR running to at anymore. I was considering a spacer with the bracket and no EGR hole, but the smallest bore is 60mm.
Tony71502 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:42 PM
  #7  
Liquid_02
4th Gear Member
 
Liquid_02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,267
Default

it's 59mm.

Originally Posted by Tony71502
I know it won't benefit me performance wise... but it's an eye sore. No coolant lines or EGR running to at anymore. I was considering a spacer with the bracket and no EGR hole, but the smallest bore is 60mm.
Then you lose your throttle cable bracketry. Sure you can always fab something up, but that will be even more of an eye sore. Or you could just get a plate like I did.


Last edited by Liquid_02; 08-03-2009 at 01:45 PM.
Liquid_02 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:48 PM
  #8  
FivePointOhh
in limbo
 
FivePointOhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,300
Default

go get a throttle body off an exploder. its a 65mm (i think, maybe 60mm)and just get a 65mm(or 60mm) spacer. then you just need to massage out the intake opening of your plenum to accept the bigger size
FivePointOhh is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:52 PM
  #9  
Tony71502
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Tony71502's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,459
Default

Well the egr spacer I wanted to get from RJM Injection tech actually has the throttle cable bracket on it. Boring the upper intake out is no problem, but Idk if I want a bigger throttle body yet. It may flow too much air for a stock block.

A 1mm larger EGR spacer shouldn't be a problem if stock is 59mm.

Last edited by Tony71502; 08-03-2009 at 01:56 PM.
Tony71502 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 02:09 PM
  #10  
FivePointOhh
in limbo
 
FivePointOhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,300
Default

it disrupts the gradual tunneling of air.

imagine a tornado. in the clouds its as large as it can be.(this is your filter) ....as you get closer to the ground it is, generally speaking, significantly more narrow(intake runner) disrupting this gradual step down of the air causes turbulance. turbulance slows air speed at specific points cause excessive noise and lower velocity.

there is more to air flow as well, its not neccesarily the amount of air you can flow its the shape in which it arrives.
example of this being. imagine a fire drill and everyone freaks out and you have a mass stampede trying to leave out one door. you have this huge cluster ****, people get hurt and it take a long time to get everyone out. now you take that same volume of people in the same situation, file them up and have them run out the door 1-2 at a time. you just you just flowed the same volume of people down the same runner size in half the amount of time.



ahving mis matched intake sizes and not match ports means your intake or heads are not flowing at what they are capable of and for sure not the speeds that could plausibly do. lost performance. you have to make sure everything is matched. even a poorly placed gasket will cause this turbulance and possibly disrupt airflow into your cylinders. its not about size in this case, its efficiency.

Last edited by FivePointOhh; 08-03-2009 at 02:14 PM.
FivePointOhh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
05-03-2018 10:38 PM
SteelerNation82
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
11
09-09-2015 09:06 AM
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM
ding56
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
08-14-2015 02:40 AM
mustangfan305
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
08-07-2015 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: Stock intake question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.