![]() |
Just got Dyno'ed!!!
Well, the Green Hornet is back and ferocious...Any guesses on the numbers? Slicks were spinning on the rollers, my fault however should of used some good street tire to grip. Still some outrageous numbers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpXTBQvptV0 |
Pretty cool
|
no idea but it sounds healthy and is a good looking car
|
UMMMM, AND THE NUMBERS????
|
well its got a tubular GT40 so it will NEVER make any more than 400.
haha... cant wait for the numbers..... i love proving people stupid. if i had a dollar for every post where someone knocked the gt40 id have like.... 50 dollars or something but i'll throw a number out there...... 512 |
it better make way more than 512
|
580 WRHP...I was amazed...And for the tubular GT40 intake...I can't agree.
|
He was being sarcastic about the tubular GT-40 intake. :P
It's actually a REALLY good intake for SBF's in street applications. I have a book written by a guy who has built TONS of race engines over the years, mostly for European racing....and when he tested SBF's both in dyno and track settings, he found that the best overall intake for an SBF that operated under 7k rpm was the stock GT-40....it made more AVERAGE power across the rpm range than even many of the race designed intakes. And I think it just looks dead sexy. |
Originally Posted by 67mustang302
(Post 7077134)
He was being sarcastic about the tubular GT-40 intake. :P
It's actually a REALLY good intake for SBF's in street applications. I have a book written by a guy who has built TONS of race engines over the years, mostly for European racing....and when he tested SBF's both in dyno and track settings, he found that the best overall intake for an SBF that operated under 7k rpm was the stock GT-40....it made more AVERAGE power across the rpm range than even many of the race designed intakes. And I think it just looks dead sexy. |
And it's sexy. Don't forget it's sexy.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands